2-29318369-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_004304.5(ALK):c.1582G>A(p.Ala528Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000533 in 1,613,760 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004304.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALK | NM_004304.5 | c.1582G>A | p.Ala528Thr | missense_variant | 8/29 | ENST00000389048.8 | NP_004295.2 | |
ALK | XR_001738688.3 | n.2509G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 8/18 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALK | ENST00000389048.8 | c.1582G>A | p.Ala528Thr | missense_variant | 8/29 | 1 | NM_004304.5 | ENSP00000373700 | P1 | |
ALK | ENST00000618119.4 | c.451G>A | p.Ala151Thr | missense_variant | 7/28 | 5 | ENSP00000482733 | |||
ALK | ENST00000498037.1 | n.137G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/5 | 4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152070Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000398 AC: 10AN: 251456Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000442 AC XY: 6AN XY: 135894
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000568 AC: 83AN: 1461690Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000426 AC XY: 31AN XY: 727180
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152070Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74286
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Neuroblastoma, susceptibility to, 3 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital | Sep 06, 2022 | The ALK c.1582G>A (p.Ala528Thr) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.0079% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a benign effect on protein function, but to our knowledge this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with ALK-related neuroblastic tumor susceptibility. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 19, 2024 | This sequence change replaces alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, with threonine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 528 of the ALK protein (p.Ala528Thr). This variant is present in population databases (rs758494304, gnomAD 0.007%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with ALK-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 580080). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Not Available"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Not Available". The threonine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Familial isolated pituitary adenoma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital | May 20, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at