2-29320797-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_004304.5(ALK):​c.1500A>G​(p.Gln500Gln) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.894 in 1,613,924 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 651,853 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.80 ( 51141 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.90 ( 600712 hom. )

Consequence

ALK
NM_004304.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.140

Publications

29 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ALK (HGNC:427): (ALK receptor tyrosine kinase) This gene encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase, which belongs to the insulin receptor superfamily. This protein comprises an extracellular domain, an hydrophobic stretch corresponding to a single pass transmembrane region, and an intracellular kinase domain. It plays an important role in the development of the brain and exerts its effects on specific neurons in the nervous system. This gene has been found to be rearranged, mutated, or amplified in a series of tumours including anaplastic large cell lymphomas, neuroblastoma, and non-small cell lung cancer. The chromosomal rearrangements are the most common genetic alterations in this gene, which result in creation of multiple fusion genes in tumourigenesis, including ALK (chromosome 2)/EML4 (chromosome 2), ALK/RANBP2 (chromosome 2), ALK/ATIC (chromosome 2), ALK/TFG (chromosome 3), ALK/NPM1 (chromosome 5), ALK/SQSTM1 (chromosome 5), ALK/KIF5B (chromosome 10), ALK/CLTC (chromosome 17), ALK/TPM4 (chromosome 19), and ALK/MSN (chromosome X).[provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]
ALK Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • neuroblastoma, susceptibility to, 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BP6
Variant 2-29320797-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-29320797-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 259266.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.14 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.913 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ALKNM_004304.5 linkc.1500A>G p.Gln500Gln synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 29 ENST00000389048.8 NP_004295.2
ALKXR_001738688.3 linkn.2427A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 7 of 18
LOC101929386XR_007086263.1 linkn.376+824T>C intron_variant Intron 2 of 4
LOC101929386XR_939920.3 linkn.89-682T>C intron_variant Intron 1 of 9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ALKENST00000389048.8 linkc.1500A>G p.Gln500Gln synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 29 1 NM_004304.5 ENSP00000373700.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.801
AC:
121799
AN:
152014
Hom.:
51134
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.515
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.958
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.874
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.898
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.914
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.868
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.917
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.864
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.919
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.829
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.878
AC:
220708
AN:
251468
AF XY:
0.884
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.504
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.885
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.896
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.907
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.914
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.918
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.896
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.904
AC:
1321580
AN:
1461792
Hom.:
600712
Cov.:
57
AF XY:
0.904
AC XY:
657332
AN XY:
727190
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.492
AC:
16485
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.885
AC:
39597
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.897
AC:
23442
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.906
AC:
35962
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.866
AC:
74717
AN:
86252
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.919
AC:
49068
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.869
AC:
5000
AN:
5752
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.921
AC:
1023908
AN:
1111948
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.884
AC:
53401
AN:
60384
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.477
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
7398
14796
22193
29591
36989
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
21464
42928
64392
85856
107320
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.801
AC:
121840
AN:
152132
Hom.:
51141
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.803
AC XY:
59713
AN XY:
74394
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.514
AC:
21313
AN:
41430
American (AMR)
AF:
0.874
AC:
13380
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.898
AC:
3118
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.914
AC:
4717
AN:
5162
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.870
AC:
4198
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.917
AC:
9720
AN:
10602
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.871
AC:
256
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.919
AC:
62522
AN:
68018
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.825
AC:
1744
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.506
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1042
2084
3126
4168
5210
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
856
1712
2568
3424
4280
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.872
Hom.:
45477
Bravo
AF:
0.785
Asia WGS
AF:
0.842
AC:
2928
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.917
EpiControl
AF:
0.913

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Neuroblastoma, susceptibility to, 3 Benign:6
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Nov 26, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:3
Mar 29, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -

Mar 02, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Apr 27, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The c.1500A>G variant affects a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in no amino acid change. One in-silico tool predicts polymorphism outcome for this variant. This variant is found in 105818/121402 control chromosomes (46888 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.8716331, which is about 2091919 times of the maximal expected frequency of a pathogenic allele (0.0000004), suggesting this variant to be the ancestral allele; therefore it is classified as Benign. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Dec 08, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.87
CADD
Benign
8.0
DANN
Benign
0.39
PhyloP100
-0.14
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2293564; hg19: chr2-29543663; COSMIC: COSV66566490; COSMIC: COSV66566490; API