2-29531941-G-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_004304.5(ALK):c.1128C>T(p.Leu376Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000606 in 1,614,182 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00039 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00063 ( 10 hom. )

Consequence

ALK
NM_004304.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.200

Variant links:

Genes affected

ALK (HGNC:427): (ALK receptor tyrosine kinase) This gene encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase, which belongs to the insulin receptor superfamily. This protein comprises an extracellular domain, an hydrophobic stretch corresponding to a single pass transmembrane region, and an intracellular kinase domain. It plays an important role in the development of the brain and exerts its effects on specific neurons in the nervous system. This gene has been found to be rearranged, mutated, or amplified in a series of tumours including anaplastic large cell lymphomas, neuroblastoma, and non-small cell lung cancer. The chromosomal rearrangements are the most common genetic alterations in this gene, which result in creation of multiple fusion genes in tumourigenesis, including ALK (chromosome 2)/EML4 (chromosome 2), ALK/RANBP2 (chromosome 2), ALK/ATIC (chromosome 2), ALK/TFG (chromosome 3), ALK/NPM1 (chromosome 5), ALK/SQSTM1 (chromosome 5), ALK/KIF5B (chromosome 10), ALK/CLTC (chromosome 17), ALK/TPM4 (chromosome 19), and ALK/MSN (chromosome X).[provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]

ALK links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.62).

BP6

Variant 2-29531941-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-29531941-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 412926.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.2 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000394 (60/152336) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00911 (44/4828). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00698. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 40 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 60 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ALK	NM_004304.5 link	c.1128C>T	p.Leu376Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 29	ENST00000389048.8	NP_004295.2	Q9UM73B6D4Y2
ALK	XR_001738688.3 link	n.2055C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 4 of 18

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ALK	ENST00000389048.8 link	c.1128C>T	p.Leu376Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 29	1	NM_004304.5	ENSP00000373700.3		Q9UM73
ALK	ENST00000618119.4 link	c.-4C>T		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 3 of 28	5		ENSP00000482733.1		A0A087WZL3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000394

AC:

AN:

152218

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000916

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00911

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00148

AC:

372

AN:

251250

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00198

AC XY:

269

AN XY:

135784

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0118

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000881

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000815

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000629

AC:

919

AN:

1461846

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000919

AC XY:

668

AN XY:

727222

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000112

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0101

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000360

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000629

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000394

AC:

AN:

152336

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000537

AC XY:

AN XY:

74484

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000240

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000915

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00911

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Alfa

AF:

0.000214

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000253

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00404

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Neuroblastoma, susceptibility to, 3

Benign:2

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Jun 21, 2021

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Feb 15, 2022

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.62

CADD

Benign

3.3

DANN

Benign

0.51

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over