2-29920633-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_004304.5(ALK):​c.27C>G​(p.Leu9Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.905 in 1,541,888 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 632,759 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L9L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.89 ( 59984 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.91 ( 572775 hom. )

Consequence

ALK
NM_004304.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0660

Publications

22 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ALK (HGNC:427): (ALK receptor tyrosine kinase) This gene encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase, which belongs to the insulin receptor superfamily. This protein comprises an extracellular domain, an hydrophobic stretch corresponding to a single pass transmembrane region, and an intracellular kinase domain. It plays an important role in the development of the brain and exerts its effects on specific neurons in the nervous system. This gene has been found to be rearranged, mutated, or amplified in a series of tumours including anaplastic large cell lymphomas, neuroblastoma, and non-small cell lung cancer. The chromosomal rearrangements are the most common genetic alterations in this gene, which result in creation of multiple fusion genes in tumourigenesis, including ALK (chromosome 2)/EML4 (chromosome 2), ALK/RANBP2 (chromosome 2), ALK/ATIC (chromosome 2), ALK/TFG (chromosome 3), ALK/NPM1 (chromosome 5), ALK/SQSTM1 (chromosome 5), ALK/KIF5B (chromosome 10), ALK/CLTC (chromosome 17), ALK/TPM4 (chromosome 19), and ALK/MSN (chromosome X).[provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]
ALK Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • neuroblastoma, susceptibility to, 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.61).
BP6
Variant 2-29920633-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-29920633-G-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 259269.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.066 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.976 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ALKNM_004304.5 linkc.27C>G p.Leu9Leu synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 29 ENST00000389048.8 NP_004295.2
ALKXR_001738688.3 linkn.954C>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 1 of 18

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ALKENST00000389048.8 linkc.27C>G p.Leu9Leu synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 29 1 NM_004304.5 ENSP00000373700.3
ENSG00000233862ENST00000669284.1 linkn.157+34616C>G intron_variant Intron 1 of 1
ENSG00000233862ENST00000769926.1 linkn.534+5586C>G intron_variant Intron 4 of 4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.887
AC:
134873
AN:
152002
Hom.:
59934
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.837
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.854
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.920
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.855
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.999
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.895
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.848
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.858
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.910
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.884
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.907
AC:
128604
AN:
141848
AF XY:
0.904
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.832
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.938
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.862
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.856
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.908
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.894
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.907
AC:
1261113
AN:
1389768
Hom.:
572775
Cov.:
64
AF XY:
0.906
AC XY:
622214
AN XY:
686492
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.833
AC:
26556
AN:
31878
American (AMR)
AF:
0.935
AC:
34146
AN:
36510
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.860
AC:
21701
AN:
25242
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
1.00
AC:
36144
AN:
36158
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.884
AC:
70597
AN:
79856
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.856
AC:
29493
AN:
34464
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.861
AC:
3700
AN:
4298
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.910
AC:
986285
AN:
1083312
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.904
AC:
52491
AN:
58050
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.476
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6943
13886
20828
27771
34714
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
21144
42288
63432
84576
105720
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.887
AC:
134982
AN:
152120
Hom.:
59984
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.887
AC XY:
65915
AN XY:
74352
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.837
AC:
34769
AN:
41534
American (AMR)
AF:
0.920
AC:
14075
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.855
AC:
2965
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.999
AC:
5112
AN:
5116
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.895
AC:
4308
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.848
AC:
8986
AN:
10598
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.861
AC:
253
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.910
AC:
61864
AN:
67974
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.886
AC:
1871
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.508
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
768
1537
2305
3074
3842
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
902
1804
2706
3608
4510
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.896
Hom.:
11207
Bravo
AF:
0.891
Asia WGS
AF:
0.949
AC:
3300
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Neuroblastoma, susceptibility to, 3 Benign:5
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:3
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 29, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -

Mar 02, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:2
Apr 27, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The c.27C>G variant affects a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in no amino acid change. 5/5 splice-site tools in Alamut predict no effect on normal splicing. This variant is found in 20199/22570 control chromosomes (9031 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.894949, which is about 2147877 times of the maximal expected frequency of a pathogenic allele (0.0000004), suggesting this variant to be the ancestral allele; therefore it is classified as Benign. -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Dec 08, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.61
CADD
Benign
8.3
DANN
Benign
0.56
PhyloP100
0.066
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs4358080; hg19: chr2-30143499; COSMIC: COSV66573286; API