2-47373890-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_002354.3(EPCAM):āc.267G>Cā(p.Gln89His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00436 in 1,614,118 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 25 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002354.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00285 AC: 433AN: 152118Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00272 AC: 684AN: 251466Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.00284 AC XY: 386AN XY: 135910
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00452 AC: 6604AN: 1461882Hom.: 22 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00440 AC XY: 3198AN XY: 727246
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00284 AC: 433AN: 152236Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00257 AC XY: 191AN XY: 74418
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:6
- -
- -
EPCAM: BP4, BS1, BS2 -
- -
Variant summary: The EPCAM c.267G>C (p.Gln89His) variant causes a missense change involving a non-conserved nucleotide with 2/3 in silico tools (SNPs&GO and Mutation Taster not captured here due to low reliability index and p-value, respectively) predicting a "damaging" outcome. The variant has been observed in the large, broad control population, ExAC, with an allele frequency of 313/121362 (1/387, 2 homozygotes), which significantly exceeds the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic EPCAM variant of 1/35211, suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories cite the variant as "likely benign/benign." Therefore, the variant of interest has been classified as Benign. -
- -
- -
not specified Benign:2
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
- -
- -
Lynch syndrome Benign:1
- -
EPCAM-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at