2-47416300-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PP3_ModerateBP6
The NM_001406658.1(MSH2):c.-522C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR premature start codon gain change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000048 in 1,459,368 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001406658.1 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000119 AC: 3AN: 251348Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000147 AC XY: 2AN XY: 135844
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000480 AC: 7AN: 1459368Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.00000688 AC XY: 5AN XY: 726218
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21120944, 18822302) -
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at