2-47445650-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 0P and 1B. BP6
The NM_000251.3(MSH2):āc.1379T>Cā(p.Met460Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000119 in 1,593,796 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000251.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152234Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000125 AC: 18AN: 1441562Hom.: 0 Cov.: 26 AF XY: 0.00000974 AC XY: 7AN XY: 718674
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152234Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74378
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
- -
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
- -
not provided Uncertain:2
The MSH2 p.Met394Thr variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in dbSNP, Cosmic or the following control databases: the 1000 Genomes Project, the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project, the Exome Aggregation Consortium (August 8th 2016), or the Genome Aggregation Database (Feb 27, 2017). The variant was identified in ClinVar (classified as a VUS by Ambry Genetics, Color, Invitae and Quest Diagnostics) and LOVD 3.0. The p.Met394 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
- -
Lynch syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
- -
Lynch syndrome Uncertain:1
- -
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at