2-47463132-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The NM_000251.3(MSH2):​c.1488A>G​(p.Leu496Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000176 in 1,614,040 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000092 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00018 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MSH2
NM_000251.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.280
Variant links:
Genes affected
MSH2 (HGNC:7325): (mutS homolog 2) This locus is frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). When cloned, it was discovered to be a human homolog of the E. coli mismatch repair gene mutS, consistent with the characteristic alterations in microsatellite sequences (RER+ phenotype) found in HNPCC. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 2-47463132-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-47463132-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 90679.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr2-47463132-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.28 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MSH2NM_000251.3 linkc.1488A>G p.Leu496Leu synonymous_variant 9/16 ENST00000233146.7 NP_000242.1 P43246-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MSH2ENST00000233146.7 linkc.1488A>G p.Leu496Leu synonymous_variant 9/161 NM_000251.3 ENSP00000233146.2 P43246-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000920
AC:
14
AN:
152244
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000393
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000115
AC:
29
AN:
251298
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000103
AC XY:
14
AN XY:
135842
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000123
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000867
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000211
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000185
AC:
270
AN:
1461678
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000180
AC XY:
131
AN XY:
727152
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000896
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000894
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000231
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000994
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000919
AC:
14
AN:
152362
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000161
AC XY:
12
AN XY:
74508
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000392
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000132
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000106
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:14
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The MSH2 p.Leu496= variant was identified in the literature to have no effect on splicing using a functional assay of exon inclusion in which patient mutant and wildtype genomic DNA was inserted into a splicing reporter minigene assay (Tournier_2008_18561205). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs267607960) “With Likely benign allele”, ClinVar (classified likely benign, reviewed by an expert panel (2013); submitters: benign by Invitae and GeneDx, and likely benign by InSIGHT, Ambry Genetics and Color Genomics Inc.), Clinvitae (3x), UMD-LSDB (2x as neutral), Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database, Insight Hereditary Tumors Database (8x as class2), and in control databases in 33 of 277114 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0001 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: African in 2 of 24030 chromosomes (freq: 0.00008), “Other” in 1 of 6460 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Latino in 3 of 34416 chromosomes (freq: 0.00009), European Non-Finnish in 27 of 126618 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002); it was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European Finnish, and South Asian populations. The variant was not identified in the COGR, Cosmic, MutDB, Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database, or the Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The p.Leu496= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJul 28, 2020- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Lynch syndrome 1 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Mar 22, 2023This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylFeb 09, 2017- -
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJul 10, 2018Variant summary: MSH2 c.1488A>G alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing, which has been confirmed by an ex vivo splicing assay (Tournier_2008). The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00012 in 277114 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in MSH2 causing Lynch Syndrome (0.00012 vs 0.00057), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.1488A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with sporadic renal cell carcinoma or epithelial ovarian cancer. These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Lynch Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 15, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 21, 2014This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthAug 04, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4May 25, 2021- -
Lynch syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panelresearchInternational Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT)Sep 05, 2013Synonymous substitution with no effect on splicing, tested with NMD inhibitor -
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 26, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.79
CADD
Benign
6.1
DANN
Benign
0.64
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs267607960; hg19: chr2-47690271; API