2-47475129-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points: 10P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP3_Strong
The NM_000251.3(MSH2):c.1864C>G(p.Pro622Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,876 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P622L) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000251.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | NM_000251.3 | c.1864C>G | p.Pro622Ala | missense_variant | 12/16 | ENST00000233146.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | ENST00000233146.7 | c.1864C>G | p.Pro622Ala | missense_variant | 12/16 | 1 | NM_000251.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461876Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727240
GnomAD4 genome ? Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Sep 01, 2020 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 21, 2022 | Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Published functional studies demonstrate a significant increase in mutation rate compared to wild-type (Ollodart et al., 2021); Observed in an individual with premature ovarian insufficiency and primary amenorrhea (Luo et al., 2020); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 18822302, 21120944, 33848333, 32772095) - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 23, 2023 | The p.P622A variant (also known as c.1864C>G), located in coding exon 12 of the MSH2 gene, results from a C to G substitution at nucleotide position 1864. The proline at codon 622 is replaced by alanine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. Based on internal structural analysis, P622A is moderately destabilizing to the local structure (Ambry internal data). In a massively parallel cell-based functional assay testing susceptibility to a DNA damaging agent, 6-thioguanine (6-TG), this variant was reported to be functionally neutral (Jia X et al. Am J Hum Genet, 2021 Jan;108:163-175). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is conflicting at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 09, 2020 | This missense variant replaces proline with alanine at codon 622 of the MSH2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals affected with hereditary cancer in the literature. However, a different missense variant at this codon, p.Pro622Leu, has been reported as disease-causing in ClinVar (variation ID: 1753) and to co-segregate with disease and exhibited functional defects in in vitro assays (InSiGHT; http://www.insight-database.org/classifications/index.html?gene=MSH2&variant=c.1865C%3ET). Moreover, other missense variants at this same codon, p.Pro622Arg, p.Pro622Thr and p.Pro622Glu, have also been reported as disease-causing in ClinVar and/or in individuals affected with Lynch syndrome-associated cancer (variation ID: 90805, 265573; InSiGHT/LOVD individual# 00199194). This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). Although there is a suspicion that this variant may be associated with disease, additional studies are necessary to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 25, 2021 | This variant disrupts the p.Pro622 amino acid residue in MSH2. Other variant(s) that disrupt this residue have been determined to be pathogenic (PMID: 8261515, 16616355, 16116158, 21309037, 24362816, 22949379). This suggests that this residue is clinically significant, and that variants that disrupt this residue are likely to be disease-causing. Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt MSH2 protein function. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with MSH2-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 186899). This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This sequence change replaces proline with alanine at codon 622 of the MSH2 protein (p.Pro622Ala). The proline residue is highly conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between proline and alanine. In summary, the currently available evidence indicates that the variant is pathogenic, but additional data are needed to prove that conclusively. Therefore, this variant has been classified as Likely Pathogenic. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at