2-47476566-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_000251.3(MSH2):c.2205C>T(p.Ile735Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000735 in 1,613,970 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 15 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00042 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00077 ( 15 hom. )
Consequence
MSH2
NM_000251.3 synonymous
NM_000251.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.239
Genes affected
MSH2 (HGNC:7325): (mutS homolog 2) This locus is frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). When cloned, it was discovered to be a human homolog of the E. coli mismatch repair gene mutS, consistent with the characteristic alterations in microsatellite sequences (RER+ phenotype) found in HNPCC. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.38).
BP6
Variant 2-47476566-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-47476566-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 138255.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=10}. Variant chr2-47476566-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr2-47476566-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.239 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00042 (64/152272) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0126 (61/4824). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0101. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 49 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 15 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | NM_000251.3 | c.2205C>T | p.Ile735Ile | synonymous_variant | 13/16 | ENST00000233146.7 | NP_000242.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | ENST00000233146.7 | c.2205C>T | p.Ile735Ile | synonymous_variant | 13/16 | 1 | NM_000251.3 | ENSP00000233146.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000427 AC: 65AN: 152154Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
65
AN:
152154
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00144 AC: 363AN: 251446Hom.: 5 AF XY: 0.00196 AC XY: 266AN XY: 135906
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
363
AN:
251446
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
266
AN XY:
135906
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000768 AC: 1122AN: 1461698Hom.: 15 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00113 AC XY: 821AN XY: 727172
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1122
AN:
1461698
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
821
AN XY:
727172
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000420 AC: 64AN: 152272Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000658 AC XY: 49AN XY: 74460
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
64
AN:
152272
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
49
AN XY:
74460
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
13
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jul 06, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 27, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The p.Ile735Ile variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site; in addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. The variant was identified in the ClinVar database, where it was classified as “benign” by GeneDX and as “likely benign” by Ambry Genetics. The variant was not identified in any of the other databases searched (dbSNP, NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (Exome Variant Server), Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database, HGMD, COSMIC, “Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database”, InSiGHT Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database, “Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database”, GeneInsight COGR database, and UMD). The variant was identified in an individual tested by our laboratory in a hemizygous state, with a co-occuring pathogenic MSH2 deletion of exons 12-16 in trans, increasing the likelihood that the variant does not have clinical significance. In summary, based on the above information this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jul 31, 2021 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 16, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jun 11, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | May 09, 2018 | - - |
Lynch syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
Lynch syndrome 1 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Mar 08, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 20, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Aug 30, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 15, 2016 | Variant summary: The MSH2 c.2205C>T (p.Ile735Ile) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 185/121382 control chromosomes (2 homozygotes), predominantly observed in the South Asian subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0109038 (180/16508). This frequency is about 19 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic MSH2 variant (0.0005683), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of South Asian origin. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign/likely benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications and/or reputable databases/clinical diagnostic laboratories; nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. One internal sample also carried a disease variant in BRCA1 c.3869_3870delAA, further suppporting the benign classification. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at