2-47478486-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_000251.3(MSH2):c.2425G>A(p.Glu809Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000669 in 1,614,102 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000251.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | NM_000251.3 | c.2425G>A | p.Glu809Lys | missense_variant | 14/16 | ENST00000233146.7 | NP_000242.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | ENST00000233146.7 | c.2425G>A | p.Glu809Lys | missense_variant | 14/16 | 1 | NM_000251.3 | ENSP00000233146 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000138 AC: 21AN: 152182Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000274 AC: 69AN: 251372Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000169 AC XY: 23AN XY: 135860
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000595 AC: 87AN: 1461802Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000468 AC XY: 34AN XY: 727196
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000138 AC: 21AN: 152300Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000161 AC XY: 12AN XY: 74480
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 16, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Oct 22, 2020 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Oct 10, 2019 | Variant summary: MSH2 c.2425G>A (p.Glu809Lys) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00027 in 251372 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0038 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 7-fold the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in MSH2 causing Lynch Syndrome phenotype (0.00057), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. c.2425G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Lynch Syndrome (Jiang_2019, Liu_2014, Pinard_2016, Tang_2009, Toh_2018, Xie_2018), predominantly in individuals of Asian origin. A database cites the variant to co-occur with a pathogenic variant in MSH2 (c.942+3A>T) and indicated that the variant did not cosegregate with disease in a family. Four ClinVar submissions (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant three times as likely benign and once as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jul 22, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | May 30, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 11, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Lynch syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Ding PR Lab, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center | - | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jul 13, 2012 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Cancer Genomics Group, Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research | May 01, 2019 | - - |
MSH2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jan 16, 2020 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The MSH2 p.Glu809Lys variant was identified in 2 of 304 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.007) from individuals or families with Lynch syndrome and was present in 4 of 600 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.007) from healthy individuals (Liu 2014, Tang 2009). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs202145681) as "With Pathogenic, Uncertain significance allele", ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae; as likely benign by three submitters; as uncertain significance by one submitter), and in UMD-LSDB (1x as unclassified variant). In UMD the variant was identified with a co-occurring pathogenic MSH2 variant (c.583G>T, p.Gly195X), increasing the likelihood that the p.Glu809Lys variant does not have clinical significance. The variant was identified in control databases in 77 of 277132 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0003 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: East Asian in 77 of 18870 chromosomes (freq: 0.004), while the variant was not observed in the African, Other, Latino, European, Ashkenazi Jewish, Finnish, and South Asian populations. The p.Glu809 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms however four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | phenotyping only | GenomeConnect, ClinGen | - | Variant interpreted as Uncertain significance and reported on 06-15-2018 by Lab or GTR ID 1197. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at