2-47783411-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The NM_000179.3(MSH6):​c.178T>C​(p.Leu60Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000642 in 1,526,992 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L60L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000059 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000065 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MSH6
NM_000179.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.61

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MSH6 (HGNC:7329): (mutS homolog 6) This gene encodes a member of the DNA mismatch repair MutS family. In E. coli, the MutS protein helps in the recognition of mismatched nucleotides prior to their repair. A highly conserved region of approximately 150 aa, called the Walker-A adenine nucleotide binding motif, exists in MutS homologs. The encoded protein heterodimerizes with MSH2 to form a mismatch recognition complex that functions as a bidirectional molecular switch that exchanges ADP and ATP as DNA mismatches are bound and dissociated. Mutations in this gene may be associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer, colorectal cancer, and endometrial cancer. Transcripts variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2013]
MSH6 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Lynch syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Lynch syndrome 5
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Genomics England PanelApp
  • mismatch repair cancer syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • mismatch repair cancer syndrome 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • malignant pancreatic neoplasm
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • Muir-Torre syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet
  • rhabdomyosarcoma
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • breast cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • prostate cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 2-47783411-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-47783411-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 135832.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.61 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MSH6NM_000179.3 linkc.178T>C p.Leu60Leu synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 10 ENST00000234420.11 NP_000170.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MSH6ENST00000234420.11 linkc.178T>C p.Leu60Leu synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 10 1 NM_000179.3 ENSP00000234420.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000592
AC:
9
AN:
151948
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000242
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0000851
AC:
11
AN:
129296
AF XY:
0.0000966
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000164
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000187
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000647
AC:
89
AN:
1375044
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000811
AC XY:
55
AN XY:
678216
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
28918
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
29748
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
23314
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
34586
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000130
AC:
1
AN:
76922
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
47722
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5512
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000802
AC:
86
AN:
1071778
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0000354
AC:
2
AN:
56544
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.469
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
5
11
16
22
27
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000592
AC:
9
AN:
151948
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000269
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74222
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000242
AC:
1
AN:
41362
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15276
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5122
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10614
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
312
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000118
AC:
8
AN:
67964
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2092
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.486
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
4
5
6
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0000832
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000416

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Jul 27, 2023
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 06, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Dec 28, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 20, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

not specified Benign:3
Mar 03, 2014
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Mar 01, 2019
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: MSH6 c.178T>C alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 6.4e-05 in 157094 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in MSH6 causing Lynch Syndrome (6.4e-05 vs 0.00014), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.178T>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with colon cancer. This report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Lynch Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Six clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Aug 19, 2022
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

MSH6: BP4, BP7 -

Apr 21, 2017
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Lynch syndrome 5 Benign:2
Mar 29, 2023
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

Jul 29, 2016
Counsyl
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Lynch syndrome Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The MSH6 p.Leu60= variant was identified in 1 of 2132 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.00046) from individuals or families with colorectal cancer (Hampel 2005). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs35819209) as “With Likely benign allele”, ClinVar and Clinvitae (6x as benign by Invitae and GeneDx, and as likely benign by Ambry Genetics, Counsyl, Color Genomics and Quest diagnostics), Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database (1x) and Insight Hereditary Tumors Database (2x). The variant was not identified in the COGR, Cosmic, MutDB, UMD-LSDB, Zhejiang University Database or the Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database. The variant was identified in control databases in 10 of 157094 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000064 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the European Non-Finnish in 9 of 66828 chromosomes (freq: 0.00013) and Ashkenazi Jewish in 1 of 6288 chromosomes (freq: 0.00016); it was not observed in the African, “Other”, Latino, East Asian, European Finnish or South Asian populations. The p.Leu60Leu variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Jan 21, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
CADD
Benign
4.2
DANN
Benign
0.67
PhyloP100
-1.6
PromoterAI
-0.053
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.92
RBP_regulation_power_radar
2.1
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35819209; hg19: chr2-48010550; API