2-47801145-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1

The NM_000179.3(MSH6):c.3162C>T(p.Ile1054Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000491 in 1,610,432 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00019 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000034 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MSH6
NM_000179.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.153

Variant links:

Genes affected

MSH6 (HGNC:7329): (mutS homolog 6) This gene encodes a member of the DNA mismatch repair MutS family. In E. coli, the MutS protein helps in the recognition of mismatched nucleotides prior to their repair. A highly conserved region of approximately 150 aa, called the Walker-A adenine nucleotide binding motif, exists in MutS homologs. The encoded protein heterodimerizes with MSH2 to form a mismatch recognition complex that functions as a bidirectional molecular switch that exchanges ADP and ATP as DNA mismatches are bound and dissociated. Mutations in this gene may be associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer, colorectal cancer, and endometrial cancer. Transcripts variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2013]

MSH6 links:

FBXO11 (HGNC:13590): (F-box protein 11) This gene encodes a member of the F-box protein family which is characterized by an approximately 40 amino acid motif, the F-box. The F-box proteins constitute one of the four subunits of ubiquitin protein ligase complex called SCFs (SKP1-cullin-F-box), which function in phosphorylation-dependent ubiquitination. The F-box proteins are divided into 3 classes: Fbws containing WD-40 domains, Fbls containing leucine-rich repeats, and Fbxs containing either different protein-protein interaction modules or no recognizable motifs. The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the Fbxs class. It can function as an arginine methyltransferase that symmetrically dimethylates arginine residues, and it acts as an adaptor protein to mediate the neddylation of p53, which leads to the suppression of p53 function. This gene is known to be down-regulated in melanocytes from patients with vitiligo, a skin disorder that results in depigmentation. Polymorphisms in this gene are associated with chronic otitis media with effusion and recurrent otitis media (COME/ROM), a hearing loss disorder, and the knockout of the homologous mouse gene results in the deaf mouse mutant Jeff (Jf), a single gene model of otitis media. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]

FBXO11 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).

BP6

Variant 2-47801145-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-47801145-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 184018.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.153 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000191 (29/152178) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.000626 (26/41528). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000439. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 17 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MSH6	NM_000179.3 link	c.3162C>T	p.Ile1054Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 10	ENST00000234420.11	NP_000170.1	P52701-1Q3SWU9

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MSH6	ENST00000234420.11 link	c.3162C>T	p.Ile1054Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 10	1	NM_000179.3	ENSP00000234420.5		P52701-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000191

AC:

AN:

152060

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000628

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000386

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0000945

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000895

AC:

AN:

245836

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000748

AC XY:

AN XY:

133670

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00101

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000290

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000109

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000111

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000890

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000343

AC:

AN:

1458254

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000345

AC XY:

AN XY:

725578

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000896

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000200

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000108

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000663

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000191

AC:

AN:

152178

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000228

AC XY:

AN XY:

74402

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000626

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000387

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.0000945

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000364

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000196

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3

Apr 23, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Dec 03, 2019

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 07, 2022

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Jul 27, 2017

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 23, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Mar 19, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Aug 31, 2017

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 13, 2019

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Lynch syndrome

Benign:1

Dec 13, 2023

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms

Benign:1

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast

Benign:1

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The MSH6 p.Ile1054= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the GeneInsight-COGR, MutDB, UMD-LSDB, Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database, Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database, Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database, or Insight Hereditary Tumors Database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs149605979) as â€šÃ„ÃºWith Likely benign alleleâ€šÃ„Ã¹ , ClinVar (as benign by Gene Dx and likely benign by Ambry Genetics, Invitae, and Quest Diagnostics), Clinvitae (3x as benign and likely benign), and Cosmic (1x in bile duct carcinoma) databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 26 of 272178 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000096 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include African in 20 of 23926 chromosomes (freq: 0.000836), Latino in 1 of 34350 chromosomes (freq: 0.000029), European (Non-Finnish) in 1 of 125540 chromosomes (freq: 0.000008), East Asian in 2 of 18794 chromosomes (freq: 0.000106), European (Finnish) in 2 of 22290 chromosomes (freq: 0.00009), while the variant was not observed in the Other, Ashkenaz iJewish, and South Asian populations. The p.Ile1054= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.56

CADD

Benign

0.30

DANN

Benign

0.78

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.8

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.030

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over