2-50236927-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001330078.2(NRXN1):c.3408G>A(p.Thr1136Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00135 in 1,613,328 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 21 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0067 ( 14 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00079 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

NRXN1
NM_001330078.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.68

Variant links:

Genes affected

NRXN1 (HGNC:8008): (neurexin 1) This gene encodes a single-pass type I membrane protein that belongs to the neurexin family. Neurexins are cell-surface receptors that bind neuroligins to form Ca(2+)-dependent neurexin/neuroligin complexes at synapses in the central nervous system. This complex is required for efficient neurotransmission and is involved in the formation of synaptic contacts. Three members of this gene family have been studied in detail and are estimated to generate over 3,000 variants through the use of two alternative promoters (alpha and beta) and extensive alternative splicing in each family member. Recently, a third promoter (gamma) was identified for this gene in the 3' region. Mutations in this gene are associated with Pitt-Hopkins-like syndrome-2 and may contribute to susceptibility to schizophrenia. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

NRXN1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.62).

BP6

Variant 2-50236927-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-50236927-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 129822.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.68 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00669 (1018/152142) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0236 (979/41532). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0223. There are 14 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 456 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 14 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NRXN1	NM_001330078.2 link	c.3408G>A	p.Thr1136Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 18 of 23	ENST00000401669.7	NP_001317007.1	E7ERL8

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
NRXN1	ENST00000401669.7 link	c.3408G>A	p.Thr1136Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 18 of 23	5	NM_001330078.2	ENSP00000385017.2		E7ERL8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00668

AC:

1016

AN:

152024

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0236

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00151

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000194

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000103

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00383

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00202

AC:

506

AN:

250478

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00134

AC XY:

181

AN XY:

135350

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0272

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00110

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000995

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000159

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00115

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000791

AC:

1156

AN:

1461186

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000696

AC XY:

506

AN XY:

726916

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0256

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00137

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000122

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00159

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00669

AC:

1018

AN:

152142

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00613

AC XY:

456

AN XY:

74348

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0236

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00151

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000195

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000103

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00379

Alfa

AF:

0.00200

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00779

EpiCase

AF:

0.000437

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3

May 18, 2012

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Nov 01, 2019

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

Pitt-Hopkins-like syndrome 2

Benign:2

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

History of neurodevelopmental disorder

Benign:1

Sep 28, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Synonymous alterations with insufficient evidence to classify as benign -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.62

CADD

Benign

2.5

DANN

Benign

0.61

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over