2-61825203-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong

The NM_001201543.2(FAM161A):​c.*1252A>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000106 in 283,984 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000011 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

FAM161A
NM_001201543.2 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.27

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
FAM161A (HGNC:25808): (FAM161 centrosomal protein A) This gene belongs to the FAM161 family. It is expressed mainly in the retina. Mouse studies suggested that this gene is involved in development of retinal progenitors during embryogenesis, and that its activity is restricted to mature photoreceptors after birth. Mutations in this gene cause autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa-28. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified.[provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]
FAM161A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • retinitis pigmentosa 28
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • retinitis pigmentosa
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.5).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
FAM161ANM_001201543.2 linkc.*1252A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 7 of 7 ENST00000404929.6 NP_001188472.1 Q3B820-3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
FAM161AENST00000404929.6 linkc.*1252A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 7 of 7 1 NM_001201543.2 ENSP00000385158.1 Q3B820-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0000174
AC:
2
AN:
114644
AF XY:
0.0000320
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000219
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000283
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000106
AC:
3
AN:
283984
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000123
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
162106
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
7346
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
22366
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10022
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
9264
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
54250
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
11942
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
1060
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000129
AC:
2
AN:
154510
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0000756
AC:
1
AN:
13224
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.492
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
1
2
2
3
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
Alfa
AF:
0.000111
Hom.:
0

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
CADD
Benign
8.5
DANN
Benign
0.93
PhyloP100
1.3

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1015093278; hg19: chr2-62052338; API