2-61825653-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_001201543.2(FAM161A):​c.*802A>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00128 in 428,192 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00045 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0017 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

FAM161A
NM_001201543.2 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0290

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
FAM161A (HGNC:25808): (FAM161 centrosomal protein A) This gene belongs to the FAM161 family. It is expressed mainly in the retina. Mouse studies suggested that this gene is involved in development of retinal progenitors during embryogenesis, and that its activity is restricted to mature photoreceptors after birth. Mutations in this gene cause autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa-28. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified.[provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]
FAM161A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • retinitis pigmentosa 28
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • retinitis pigmentosa
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.94).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000448 (68/151830) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.0079 (38/4810). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00592. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 42 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
FAM161ANM_001201543.2 linkc.*802A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 7 of 7 ENST00000404929.6 NP_001188472.1 Q3B820-3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
FAM161AENST00000404929.6 linkc.*802A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 7 of 7 1 NM_001201543.2 ENSP00000385158.1 Q3B820-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000442
AC:
67
AN:
151720
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00577
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00768
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000295
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00288
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00163
AC:
171
AN:
104822
AF XY:
0.00177
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000439
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00584
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000242
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000312
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00174
AC:
481
AN:
276362
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.00229
AC XY:
363
AN XY:
158696
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
6550
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000393
AC:
8
AN:
20378
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00644
AC:
63
AN:
9784
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
9096
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00711
AC:
379
AN:
53332
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
11654
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00203
AC:
2
AN:
986
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000923
AC:
14
AN:
151722
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00117
AC:
15
AN:
12860
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0.000000), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.392
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
21
43
64
86
107
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000448
AC:
68
AN:
151830
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000566
AC XY:
42
AN XY:
74242
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41492
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000131
AC:
2
AN:
15250
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00577
AC:
20
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00790
AC:
38
AN:
4810
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10440
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000295
AC:
2
AN:
67880
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00285
AC:
6
AN:
2102
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.510
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000609
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.000355

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.94
CADD
Benign
2.6
DANN
Benign
0.38
PhyloP100
-0.029
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs541819550; hg19: chr2-62052788; API