2-63492955-A-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_015910.7(WDPCP):c.76-15T>A variant causes a intron change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00177 in 1,609,200 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 68 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0010 ( 5 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0018 ( 63 hom. )

Consequence

WDPCP
NM_015910.7 intron

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.78

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

WDPCP (HGNC:28027): (WD repeat containing planar cell polarity effector) This gene encodes a cytoplasmic WD40 repeat protein. A similar gene in frogs encodes a planar cell polarity protein that plays a critical role in collective cell movement and ciliogenesis by mediating septin localization. Mutations in this gene are associated with Bardet-Biedl syndrome 15 and may also play a role in Meckel-Gruber syndrome. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2014]

WDPCP Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 15
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Bardet-Biedl syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
heart defect - tongue hamartoma - polysyndactyly syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

WDPCP links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.4).

BP6

Variant 2-63492955-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-63492955-A-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 260682.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00101 (154/152276) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.0311 (150/4830). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.027. There are 5 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 119 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
WDPCP	NM_015910.7 link	c.76-15T>A		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 17	ENST00000272321.12	NP_056994.3	O95876-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
WDPCP	ENST00000272321.12 link	c.76-15T>A		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 17	1	NM_015910.7	ENSP00000272321.7		O95876-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00103

AC:

157

AN:

152158

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.0317

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000955

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00382

AC:

939

AN:

246068

AF XY:

0.00498

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000146

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000379

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00251

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00185

AC:

2692

AN:

1456924

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00258

AC XY:

1873

AN XY:

724974

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33392

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000157

AC:

AN:

44666

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25856

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000505

AC:

AN:

39580

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0278

AC:

2392

AN:

86010

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53002

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00104

AC:

AN:

5754

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000137

AC:

152

AN:

1108468

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00221

AC:

133

AN:

60196

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.476

Heterozygous variant carriers

111

222

333

444

555

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

114

152

190

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00101

AC:

154

AN:

152276

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00160

AC XY:

119

AN XY:

74452

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000240

AC:

AN:

41582

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000654

AC:

AN:

15288

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3440

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5182

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0311

AC:

150

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10610

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68022

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000945

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.487

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000299

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000140

Asia WGS

AF:

0.0110

AC:

AN:

3474

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 15

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 15, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.40

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.70

PhyloP100

4.8

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.15

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over