2-73385903-T-TGGAGGAGGA

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP3BP6BS1BS2

The NM_001378454.1(ALMS1):​c.66_74dup​(p.Glu26_Glu28dup) variant causes a inframe insertion change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0025 ( 2 hom., cov: 0)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0039 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

ALMS1
NM_001378454.1 inframe_insertion

Scores

Not classified

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.369
Variant links:
Genes affected
ALMS1 (HGNC:428): (ALMS1 centrosome and basal body associated protein) This gene encodes a protein containing a large tandem-repeat domain as well as additional low complexity regions. The encoded protein functions in microtubule organization, particularly in the formation and maintanance of cilia. Mutations in this gene cause Alstrom syndrome. There is a pseudogene for this gene located adjacent in the same region of chromosome 2. Alternative splice variants have been described but their full length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP3
Nonframeshift variant in repetitive region in NM_001378454.1
BP6
Variant 2-73385903-T-TGGAGGAGGA is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-73385903-T-TGGAGGAGGA is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 193379.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=4}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00255 (366/143614) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0136 (58/4258). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0108. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 182 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 0. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ALMS1NM_001378454.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.66_74dup p.Glu26_Glu28dup inframe_insertion 1/23 ENST00000613296.6
ALMS1NM_015120.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.66_74dup p.Glu26_Glu28dup inframe_insertion 1/23

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ALMS1ENST00000613296.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.66_74dup p.Glu26_Glu28dup inframe_insertion 1/231 NM_001378454.1 P3Q8TCU4-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00255
AC:
366
AN:
143510
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
0
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000778
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00450
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00151
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00718
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0136
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00128
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00355
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00239
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00307
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00428
AC:
357
AN:
83366
Hom.:
4
AF XY:
0.00456
AC XY:
199
AN XY:
43654
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000456
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00683
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000937
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00666
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0106
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000717
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00108
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00325
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00389
AC:
2169
AN:
557620
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.00433
AC XY:
1288
AN XY:
297754
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000570
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00637
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00142
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0142
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0117
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00210
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00289
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00255
AC:
366
AN:
143614
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.00261
AC XY:
182
AN XY:
69648
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000776
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00456
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00151
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00720
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0136
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00128
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00238
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00304

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:6
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsApr 27, 2017- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJul 01, 2024ALMS1: BS1, BS2 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 16, 2021- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Alstrom syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Nov 01, 2019- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 06, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenomic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesMar 05, 2018- -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Oct 20, 2014- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 19, 2018This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs55889738; hg19: chr2-73613031; API