2-73453381-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001378454.1(ALMS1):​c.6854G>C​(p.Arg2285Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.258 in 1,613,278 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 66,720 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/17 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R2285H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.39 ( 15845 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.24 ( 50875 hom. )

Consequence

ALMS1
NM_001378454.1 missense

Scores

14

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.13

Publications

35 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ALMS1 (HGNC:428): (ALMS1 centrosome and basal body associated protein) This gene encodes a protein containing a large tandem-repeat domain as well as additional low complexity regions. The encoded protein functions in microtubule organization, particularly in the formation and maintanance of cilia. Mutations in this gene cause Alstrom syndrome. There is a pseudogene for this gene located adjacent in the same region of chromosome 2. Alternative splice variants have been described but their full length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]
ALMS1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Alstrom syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=1.2201531E-6).
BP6
Variant 2-73453381-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-73453381-G-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 383760.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.761 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ALMS1NM_001378454.1 linkc.6854G>C p.Arg2285Pro missense_variant Exon 8 of 23 ENST00000613296.6 NP_001365383.1
ALMS1NM_015120.4 linkc.6854G>C p.Arg2285Pro missense_variant Exon 8 of 23 NP_055935.4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ALMS1ENST00000613296.6 linkc.6854G>C p.Arg2285Pro missense_variant Exon 8 of 23 1 NM_001378454.1 ENSP00000482968.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.387
AC:
58584
AN:
151550
Hom.:
15782
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.768
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.269
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.372
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.205
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00713
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.150
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.242
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.210
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.239
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.341
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.267
AC:
66335
AN:
248434
AF XY:
0.249
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.784
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.408
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.204
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00607
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.233
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.237
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.244
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.244
AC:
356869
AN:
1461610
Hom.:
50875
Cov.:
38
AF XY:
0.240
AC XY:
174511
AN XY:
727100
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.781
AC:
26148
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.408
AC:
18252
AN:
44684
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.204
AC:
5321
AN:
26130
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0122
AC:
485
AN:
39690
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.167
AC:
14429
AN:
86252
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.232
AC:
12356
AN:
53346
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.244
AC:
1406
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.237
AC:
263324
AN:
1111874
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.251
AC:
15148
AN:
60388
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.476
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
15762
31523
47285
63046
78808
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
9048
18096
27144
36192
45240
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.387
AC:
58711
AN:
151668
Hom.:
15845
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.380
AC XY:
28163
AN XY:
74074
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.768
AC:
31769
AN:
41348
American (AMR)
AF:
0.373
AC:
5671
AN:
15204
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.205
AC:
710
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00715
AC:
37
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.151
AC:
724
AN:
4804
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.242
AC:
2536
AN:
10460
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.219
AC:
64
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.239
AC:
16244
AN:
67896
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.337
AC:
711
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1391
2782
4174
5565
6956
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
476
952
1428
1904
2380
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.222
Hom.:
3112
Bravo
AF:
0.416
TwinsUK
AF:
0.230
AC:
851
ALSPAC
AF:
0.234
AC:
901
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.742
AC:
2723
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.239
AC:
1952
ExAC
AF:
0.269
AC:
32512
Asia WGS
AF:
0.124
AC:
432
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.232
EpiControl
AF:
0.237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Alstrom syndrome Benign:5
Jul 14, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 01, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:4
Sep 09, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 21, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Arg2284Pro in exon 8 of ALMS1: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 87.82% (1161/1322) of African chro mosomes by the 1000 Genomes Project (Phase 3; dbSNP rs6546839). -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Dec 21, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.053
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.46
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.29
CADD
Benign
18
DANN
Benign
0.70
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0072
T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.74
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.41
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.011
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.40
T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0000012
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.99
T
PhyloP100
3.1
PrimateAI
Benign
0.36
T
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T;T;T
Vest4
0.064
ClinPred
0.013
T
GERP RS
5.5
Varity_R
0.19
gMVP
0.22
Mutation Taster
=97/3
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs6546839; hg19: chr2-73680508; COSMIC: COSV107272370; COSMIC: COSV107272370; API