2-73938978-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 1P and 9B. PP3BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_080916.3(DGUOK):ā€‹c.211C>Gā€‹(p.Pro71Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000355 in 1,614,010 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00049 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00034 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

DGUOK
NM_080916.3 missense

Scores

8
8
2

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:8B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.42
Variant links:
Genes affected
DGUOK (HGNC:2858): (deoxyguanosine kinase) In mammalian cells, the phosphorylation of purine deoxyribonucleosides is mediated predominantly by two deoxyribonucleoside kinases, cytosolic deoxycytidine kinase and mitochondrial deoxyguanosine kinase. The protein encoded by this gene is responsible for phosphorylation of purine deoxyribonucleosides in the mitochondrial matrix. In addition, this protein phosphorylates several purine deoxyribonucleoside analogs used in the treatment of lymphoproliferative disorders, and this phosphorylation is critical for the effectiveness of the analogs. Alternative splice variants encoding different protein isoforms have been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

PP3
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 6: BayesDel_addAF, BayesDel_noAF, Cadd, MutationAssessor, PROVEAN, REVEL [when max_spliceai, FATHMM_MKL, MetaRNN, MutationTaster was below the threshold]
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0591152).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000341 (499/1461764) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00454 (203/44722). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00403. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 225 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 4 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
DGUOKNM_080916.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.211C>G p.Pro71Ala missense_variant 2/7 ENST00000264093.9 NP_550438.1 Q16854-1E5KSL5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DGUOKENST00000264093.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.211C>G p.Pro71Ala missense_variant 2/71 NM_080916.3 ENSP00000264093.4 Q16854-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000493
AC:
75
AN:
152128
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00288
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000397
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000955
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000879
AC:
221
AN:
251464
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000721
AC XY:
98
AN XY:
135908
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00463
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000290
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00456
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000341
AC:
499
AN:
1461764
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000309
AC XY:
225
AN XY:
727194
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000120
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00454
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000236
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000480
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000486
AC:
74
AN:
152246
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000497
AC XY:
37
AN XY:
74442
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000482
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00281
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000397
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000945
Alfa
AF:
0.000281
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000638
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000539
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.000766
AC:
93
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.000356

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:8Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicFeb 09, 2024BS1, PP3 -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jun 07, 2018- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpOct 21, 2022This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 71 of the DGUOK protein (p.Pro71Ala). This variant is present in population databases (rs184770596, gnomAD 0.4%), and has an allele count higher than expected for a pathogenic variant. This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with clinical features of mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome (PMID: 25131622). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 208752). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) has been performed at Invitae for this missense variant, however the output from this modeling did not meet the statistical confidence thresholds required to predict the impact of this variant on DGUOK protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not specified Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 19, 2017The P71A variant in the DGUOK gene has been reported in the homozygous state in an individual with intellectual disability and spastic quadriplegia, but the publication does not comment on the presence or absence of liver disease (Srivastava et al., 2014). The P71A variant is observed in 65/22564 (0.56%) alleles, although not in the homozygous state, from individuals of Latino background in the ExAC dataset (Lek et al., 2016). The P71A variant is a semi-conservative amino acid substitution, which may impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in some properties. This substitution occurs at a position that is conserved across species. In silico analysis predicts this variant is probably damaging to the protein structure/function. We interpret P71A as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJun 23, 2023Variant summary: DGUOK c.211C>G (p.Pro71Ala) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Deoxynucleoside kinase domain (IPR031314) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00088 in 251464 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0046 within the Latino subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in DGUOK causing DGUOK-Related Disorders, allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.211C>G has been reported in the literature in at least one homozygous individual affected with Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome, 3 (example: Srivastava_2014). These data indicate that the variant may be associated with disease. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publication has been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 25131622). Five submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. All submitters classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 3 (hepatocerebral type) Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJul 26, 2018The DGUOK c.211C>G (p.Pro71Ala) variant is a missense variant that has been reported in a homozygous state in one individual with mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome, type 3 (Srivastava et al. 2014). Control data are unavailable for this variant, which is reported at a frequency of 0.014019 in the Iberian population of the 1000 Genomes Project. The evidence for this variant is limited. The p.Pro71Ala variant is therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance but suspicious for pathogenicity for mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome. This variant was observed by ICSL as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. -
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsAug 07, 2014There is insufficient or conflicting evidence for classification of this alteration. -
Progressive external ophthalmoplegia with mitochondrial DNA deletions, autosomal recessive 4;C5191055:Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 3 (hepatocerebral type);CN305369:Portal hypertension, noncirrhotic, 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsMar 01, 2022- -
DGUOK-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesDec 23, 2021This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.56
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.19
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.49
CADD
Pathogenic
26
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.95
D;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.54
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.58
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.89
D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.059
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.65
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.0
M;M
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.51
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-7.6
D;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.83
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D
Polyphen
0.97
D;.
Vest4
0.84
MVP
1.0
MPC
0.33
ClinPred
0.24
T
GERP RS
5.3
Varity_R
0.92
gMVP
0.71

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs184770596; hg19: chr2-74166105; API