20-10639764-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000214.3(JAG1):c.3391G>A(p.Ala1131Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000322 in 1,614,018 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A1131S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000059 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000029 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

JAG1
NM_000214.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.46

Publications

4 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

JAG1 (HGNC:6188): (jagged canonical Notch ligand 1) The jagged 1 protein encoded by JAG1 is the human homolog of the Drosophilia jagged protein. Human jagged 1 is the ligand for the receptor notch 1, the latter is involved in signaling processes. Mutations that alter the jagged 1 protein cause Alagille syndrome. Jagged 1 signalling through notch 1 has also been shown to play a role in hematopoiesis. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2019]

JAG1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Alagille syndrome due to a JAG1 point mutation
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, axonal, Type 2HH
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
tetralogy of fallot
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

JAG1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.08956632).

BP6

Variant 20-10639764-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-10639764-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 536530.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0000591 (9/152250) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00104 (5/4822). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000408. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 6 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 9 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
JAG1	NM_000214.3 link	c.3391G>A	p.Ala1131Thr	missense_variant	Exon 26 of 26	ENST00000254958.10	NP_000205.1	P78504-1Q99740

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
JAG1	ENST00000254958.10 link	c.3391G>A	p.Ala1131Thr	missense_variant	Exon 26 of 26	1	NM_000214.3	ENSP00000254958.4	P78504-1
JAG1	ENST00000423891.6 link	n.3257G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 24 of 25	2
JAG1	ENST00000617357.1 link	n.*106G>A		downstream_gene_variant		2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000592

AC:

AN:

152132

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000578

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00104

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000596

AC:

AN:

251480

AF XY:

0.0000662

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000707

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000879

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000294

AC:

AN:

1461768

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000248

AC XY:

AN XY:

727190

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33472

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44720

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26132

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000882

AC:

AN:

39696

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000348

AC:

AN:

86246

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000270

AC:

AN:

1111922

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000331

AC:

AN:

60392

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.495

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000591

AC:

AN:

152250

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000806

AC XY:

AN XY:

74434

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41540

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000654

AC:

AN:

15298

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000580

AC:

AN:

5174

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00104

AC:

AN:

4822

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10610

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68016

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.569

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000604

ExAC

AF:

0.0000741

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Tetralogy of Fallot;C1866053:Deafness, congenital heart defects, and posterior embryotoxon;C1956125:Alagille syndrome due to a JAG1 point mutation

Uncertain:1

Oct 31, 2018

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Alagille syndrome due to a JAG1 point mutation

Benign:1

Aug 30, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

JAG1-related disorder

Benign:1

Jan 30, 2024

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.069

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.17

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.13

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.55

Eigen

Benign

0.16

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.33

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.90

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.87

M_CAP

Benign

0.023

MetaRNN

Benign

0.090

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.33

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.9

PhyloP100

4.5

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.51

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.1

REVEL

Uncertain

0.41

Sift

Benign

0.099

Sift4G

Benign

0.31

Polyphen

0.48

Vest4

0.31

MutPred

0.13

Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.2233);

MVP

0.63

MPC

0.56

ClinPred

0.061

GERP RS

5.7

Varity_R

0.10

gMVP

0.27

Mutation Taster

=44/56

disease causing

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over