20-10641566-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000214.3(JAG1):​c.2810G>A​(p.Arg937Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00218 in 1,614,150 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R937W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0019 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0022 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

JAG1
NM_000214.3 missense

Scores

6
13

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.49

Publications

22 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
JAG1 (HGNC:6188): (jagged canonical Notch ligand 1) The jagged 1 protein encoded by JAG1 is the human homolog of the Drosophilia jagged protein. Human jagged 1 is the ligand for the receptor notch 1, the latter is involved in signaling processes. Mutations that alter the jagged 1 protein cause Alagille syndrome. Jagged 1 signalling through notch 1 has also been shown to play a role in hematopoiesis. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2019]
JAG1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Alagille syndrome due to a JAG1 point mutation
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia
  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, axonal, Type 2HH
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • tetralogy of fallot
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.01222077).
BP6
Variant 20-10641566-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-10641566-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 213527.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00186 (284/152292) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.00425 (65/15304). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00342. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 115 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 284 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
JAG1NM_000214.3 linkc.2810G>A p.Arg937Gln missense_variant Exon 23 of 26 ENST00000254958.10 NP_000205.1 P78504-1Q99740

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
JAG1ENST00000254958.10 linkc.2810G>A p.Arg937Gln missense_variant Exon 23 of 26 1 NM_000214.3 ENSP00000254958.4 P78504-1
JAG1ENST00000423891.6 linkn.2676G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 21 of 25 2
JAG1ENST00000617965.2 linkn.*14G>A downstream_gene_variant 5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00187
AC:
284
AN:
152174
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000386
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00425
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00576
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00290
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00237
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00192
AC:
483
AN:
251308
AF XY:
0.00221
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000431
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000983
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00507
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00239
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00221
AC:
3229
AN:
1461858
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00225
AC XY:
1638
AN XY:
727236
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000448
AC:
15
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00134
AC:
60
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00517
AC:
135
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00341
AC:
294
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000225
AC:
12
AN:
53396
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00173
AC:
10
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00230
AC:
2555
AN:
1112004
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00245
AC:
148
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.464
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
202
403
605
806
1008
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
94
188
282
376
470
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00186
AC:
284
AN:
152292
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00154
AC XY:
115
AN XY:
74474
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000385
AC:
16
AN:
41558
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00425
AC:
65
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00576
AC:
20
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00291
AC:
14
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0136
AC:
4
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00237
AC:
161
AN:
68024
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00189
AC:
4
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
14
28
42
56
70
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00167
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00218
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00243
AC:
9
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00156
AC:
6
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00209
AC:
18
ExAC
AF:
0.00217
AC:
263
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00260
AC:
9
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00316
EpiControl
AF:
0.00314

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
May 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

JAG1: PP2, BP4, BS1 -

Feb 13, 2017
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Apr 18, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 12497640, 20437614, 26760175, 25260786, 22040217, 19948535, 23956173, 28444304) -

not specified Benign:3
Nov 23, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 14, 2019
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Alagille syndrome due to a JAG1 point mutation Benign:3
Oct 15, 2018
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

This variant is interpreted as Benign, for Alagille syndrome 1, autosomal dominant. The following ACMG Tag(s) were applied: BS1 => Allele frequency is greater than expected for disorder. BS3 => Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20437614). -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Isolated Nonsyndromic Congenital Heart Disease Benign:1
Mar 06, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Tetralogy of Fallot;C1866053:Deafness, congenital heart defects, and posterior embryotoxon;C1956125:Alagille syndrome due to a JAG1 point mutation;C5562003:Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, axonal, Type 2HH Benign:1
Apr 08, 2022
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jul 20, 2017
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.081
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.16
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.0
CADD
Benign
23
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.46
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.32
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.12
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.89
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.93
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.023
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.012
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.68
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.13
N
PhyloP100
3.5
PrimateAI
Benign
0.28
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.74
N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.44
Sift
Benign
0.31
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.54
T
Polyphen
0.093
B
Vest4
0.71
MVP
0.97
MPC
0.53
ClinPred
0.0087
T
GERP RS
3.8
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.068
gMVP
0.44
Mutation Taster
=79/21
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs145895196; hg19: chr20-10622214; COSMIC: COSV108074503; COSMIC: COSV108074503; API