20-32985809-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 9 ACMG points: 9P and 0B. PM2PM5PP2PP3_Strong
The NM_080675.4(SUN5):c.824C>G(p.Thr275Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,844 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T275M) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_080675.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- spermatogenic failure 16Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 9 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_080675.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUN5 | NM_080675.4 | MANE Select | c.824C>G | p.Thr275Arg | missense | Exon 11 of 13 | NP_542406.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUN5 | ENST00000356173.8 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.824C>G | p.Thr275Arg | missense | Exon 11 of 13 | ENSP00000348496.3 | ||
| SUN5 | ENST00000375523.7 | TSL:5 | c.749C>G | p.Thr250Arg | missense | Exon 10 of 12 | ENSP00000364673.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461844Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727234 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at