20-34575208-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM2BP4
The NM_080476.5(PIGU):c.1090G>T(p.Val364Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,461,850 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V364I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_080476.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis defect 21Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Illumina
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_080476.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIGU | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1090G>T | p.Val364Phe | missense | Exon 11 of 12 | ENSP00000217446.3 | Q9H490-1 | ||
| PIGU | TSL:1 | c.1030G>T | p.Val344Phe | missense | Exon 10 of 11 | ENSP00000363953.2 | Q9H490-2 | ||
| PIGU | c.1081G>T | p.Val361Phe | missense | Exon 11 of 12 | ENSP00000610129.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1461850Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727230 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at