20-35433441-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000557.5(GDF5):​c.*468G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00401 in 324,166 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 18 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0075 ( 15 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00087 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

GDF5
NM_000557.5 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0650
Variant links:
Genes affected
GDF5 (HGNC:4220): (growth differentiation factor 5) This gene encodes a secreted ligand of the TGF-beta (transforming growth factor-beta) superfamily of proteins. Ligands of this family bind various TGF-beta receptors leading to recruitment and activation of SMAD family transcription factors that regulate gene expression. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate each subunit of the disulfide-linked homodimer. This protein regulates the development of numerous tissue and cell types, including cartilage, joints, brown fat, teeth, and the growth of neuronal axons and dendrites. Mutations in this gene are associated with acromesomelic dysplasia, brachydactyly, chondrodysplasia, multiple synostoses syndrome, proximal symphalangism, and susceptibility to osteoarthritis. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]
GDF5-AS1 (HGNC:33435): (GDF5 antisense RNA 1) Predicted to be located in mitochondrion. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.71).
BP6
Variant 20-35433441-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-35433441-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 895403.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00755 (1150/152320) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0263 (1093/41564). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.025. There are 15 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 512 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 15 SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
GDF5NM_000557.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.*468G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 2/2 ENST00000374369.8 NP_000548.2
GDF5-AS1NR_161326.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.135+278C>T intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant
GDF5NM_001319138.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.*468G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 4/4 NP_001306067.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GDF5ENST00000374369.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.*468G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 2/21 NM_000557.5 ENSP00000363489 P1
GDF5ENST00000374372.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.*468G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 4/41 ENSP00000363492 P1
GDF5-AS1ENST00000374375.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.135+278C>T intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00754
AC:
1148
AN:
152202
Hom.:
15
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0263
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00717
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000867
AC:
149
AN:
171846
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.000666
AC XY:
62
AN XY:
93078
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0236
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00107
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000601
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000114
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000942
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00755
AC:
1150
AN:
152320
Hom.:
15
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00687
AC XY:
512
AN XY:
74480
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0263
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00710
Alfa
AF:
0.00391
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00869
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Grebe syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Multiple synostoses syndrome 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 12, 2021See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -
Brachydactyly Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Acromesomelic dysplasia 2B Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Acromesomelic dysplasia 2C, Hunter-Thompson type Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.71
CADD
Benign
6.2
DANN
Benign
0.65

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.060
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs79051206; hg19: chr20-34021239; API