20-36892303-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_015474.4(SAMHD1):c.*629C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0474 in 158,314 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 605 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.049 ( 605 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
SAMHD1
NM_015474.4 3_prime_UTR
NM_015474.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.167
Genes affected
SAMHD1 (HGNC:15925): (SAM and HD domain containing deoxynucleoside triphosphate triphosphohydrolase 1) This gene may play a role in regulation of the innate immune response. The encoded protein is upregulated in response to viral infection and may be involved in mediation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha proinflammatory responses. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]
TLDC2 (HGNC:16112): (TBC/LysM-associated domain containing 2) Predicted to be involved in response to oxidative stress. Predicted to act upstream of or within negative regulation of oxidative stress-induced neuron death. Predicted to be active in nucleus. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).
BP6
Variant 20-36892303-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-36892303-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 338330.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.17 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAMHD1 | NM_015474.4 | c.*629C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 16/16 | ENST00000646673.2 | ||
TLDC2 | NM_080628.3 | c.*18-559G>A | intron_variant | ENST00000217320.8 | |||
SAMHD1 | NM_001363729.2 | c.*629C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 15/15 | |||
TLDC2 | NM_001304783.1 | c.*18-559G>A | intron_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAMHD1 | ENST00000646673.2 | c.*629C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 16/16 | NM_015474.4 | P1 | |||
TLDC2 | ENST00000217320.8 | c.*18-559G>A | intron_variant | 1 | NM_080628.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0491 AC: 7466AN: 152090Hom.: 605 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
7466
AN:
152090
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00115 AC: 7AN: 6106Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00141 AC XY: 5AN XY: 3550
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
7
AN:
6106
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
3550
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0492 AC: 7495AN: 152208Hom.: 605 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0475 AC XY: 3538AN XY: 74422
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
7495
AN:
152208
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
3538
AN XY:
74422
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
39
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Chilblain lupus 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at