20-36892427-A-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting
The NM_015474.4(SAMHD1):c.*505T>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00135 in 191,538 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
SAMHD1
NM_015474.4 3_prime_UTR
NM_015474.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.271
Genes affected
SAMHD1 (HGNC:15925): (SAM and HD domain containing deoxynucleoside triphosphate triphosphohydrolase 1) This gene may play a role in regulation of the innate immune response. The encoded protein is upregulated in response to viral infection and may be involved in mediation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha proinflammatory responses. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]
TLDC2 (HGNC:16112): (TBC/LysM-associated domain containing 2) Predicted to be involved in response to oxidative stress. Predicted to act upstream of or within negative regulation of oxidative stress-induced neuron death. Predicted to be active in nucleus. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00136 (207/152166) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0027 (184/68034). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00238. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 84 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAMHD1 | NM_015474.4 | c.*505T>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 16/16 | ENST00000646673.2 | ||
TLDC2 | NM_080628.3 | c.*18-435A>T | intron_variant | ENST00000217320.8 | |||
SAMHD1 | NM_001363729.2 | c.*505T>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 15/15 | |||
TLDC2 | NM_001304783.1 | c.*18-435A>T | intron_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAMHD1 | ENST00000646673.2 | c.*505T>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 16/16 | NM_015474.4 | P1 | |||
TLDC2 | ENST00000217320.8 | c.*18-435A>T | intron_variant | 1 | NM_080628.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00136 AC: 207AN: 152166Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
207
AN:
152166
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00132 AC: 52AN: 39372Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.000992 AC XY: 21AN XY: 21160
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
52
AN:
39372
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
21
AN XY:
21160
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00136 AC: 207AN: 152166Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00113 AC XY: 84AN XY: 74348
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
207
AN:
152166
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
84
AN XY:
74348
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Chilblain lupus 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome 5 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at