20-36892570-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong

The NM_015474.4(SAMHD1):​c.*362G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000642 in 296,120 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000079 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000049 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

SAMHD1
NM_015474.4 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.11

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SAMHD1 (HGNC:15925): (SAM and HD domain containing deoxynucleoside triphosphate triphosphohydrolase 1) This gene may play a role in regulation of the innate immune response. The encoded protein is upregulated in response to viral infection and may be involved in mediation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha proinflammatory responses. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]
TLDC2 (HGNC:16112): (TBC/LysM-associated domain containing 2) Predicted to be involved in response to oxidative stress. Predicted to act upstream of or within negative regulation of oxidative stress-induced neuron death. Predicted to be active in nucleus. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.94).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SAMHD1NM_015474.4 linkc.*362G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 16 of 16 ENST00000646673.2 NP_056289.2 Q9Y3Z3-1Q59H15
TLDC2NM_080628.3 linkc.*18-292C>T intron_variant Intron 6 of 6 ENST00000217320.8 NP_542195.1 A0PJX2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SAMHD1ENST00000646673.2 linkc.*362G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 16 of 16 NM_015474.4 ENSP00000493536.2 Q9Y3Z3-1
TLDC2ENST00000217320.8 linkc.*18-292C>T intron_variant Intron 6 of 6 1 NM_080628.3 ENSP00000217320.3 A0PJX2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000790
AC:
12
AN:
151950
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000484
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000656
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000958
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000486
AC:
7
AN:
144170
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000379
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
79128
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3704
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5562
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3412
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5936
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25604
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
6220
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
494
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000813
AC:
7
AN:
86134
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
7104
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.404
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
3
4
5
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000790
AC:
12
AN:
151950
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000539
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74194
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000484
AC:
2
AN:
41352
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000656
AC:
1
AN:
15246
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3462
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4812
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10576
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000103
AC:
7
AN:
68006
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000958
AC:
2
AN:
2088
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
4
5
6
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000285
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000756

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Chilblain lupus 2 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome 5 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.94
CADD
Benign
0.49
DANN
Benign
0.60
PhyloP100
-1.1
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
0.97

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs886056646; hg19: chr20-35520973; API