20-36892812-G-A

Position:

chr20-36892812-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 2P and 10B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1

The NM_015474.4(SAMHD1):c.*120C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000152 in 1,271,316 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00016 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

SAMHD1
NM_015474.4 3_prime_UTR

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, single submitter B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.114

Variant links:

Genes affected

SAMHD1 (HGNC:15925): (SAM and HD domain containing deoxynucleoside triphosphate triphosphohydrolase 1) This gene may play a role in regulation of the innate immune response. The encoded protein is upregulated in response to viral infection and may be involved in mediation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha proinflammatory responses. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]

SAMHD1 links:

TLDC2 (HGNC:16112): (TBC/LysM-associated domain containing 2) Predicted to be involved in response to oxidative stress. Predicted to act upstream of or within negative regulation of oxidative stress-induced neuron death. Predicted to be active in nucleus. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

TLDC2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).

BP6

Variant 20-36892812-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-36892812-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 896157.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000112 (17/152198) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0027 (14/5188). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00163. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 9 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
SAMHD1	NM_015474.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.*120C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	16/16	ENST00000646673.2
TLDC2	NM_080628.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.*18-50G>A		intron_variant		ENST00000217320.8

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
SAMHD1	ENST00000646673.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.*120C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	16/16		NM_015474.4	P1	Q9Y3Z3-1
TLDC2	ENST00000217320.8 linkuse as main transcript	c.*18-50G>A		intron_variant		1	NM_080628.3	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

152080

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00269

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000329

AC:

AN:

246260

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000299

AC XY:

AN XY:

133682

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000635

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00396

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000273

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000166

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000157

AC:

176

AN:

1119118

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000154

AC XY:

AN XY:

572500

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000375

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00384

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000152

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000175

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000611

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

152198

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000121

AC XY:

AN XY:

74420

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00270

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000208

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000712

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000155

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Chilblain lupus 2

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome 5

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.85

CADD

Benign

2.4

DANN

Benign

0.41

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over