20-36892837-A-G

Position:

chr20-36892837-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_015474.4(SAMHD1):c.*95T>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0011 in 1,485,940 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00085 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

SAMHD1
NM_015474.4 3_prime_UTR

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.80

Variant links:

Genes affected

SAMHD1 (HGNC:15925): (SAM and HD domain containing deoxynucleoside triphosphate triphosphohydrolase 1) This gene may play a role in regulation of the innate immune response. The encoded protein is upregulated in response to viral infection and may be involved in mediation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha proinflammatory responses. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]

SAMHD1 links:

TLDC2 (HGNC:16112): (TBC/LysM-associated domain containing 2) Predicted to be involved in response to oxidative stress. Predicted to act upstream of or within negative regulation of oxidative stress-induced neuron death. Predicted to be active in nucleus. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

TLDC2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).

BP6

Variant 20-36892837-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-36892837-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 338336.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000853 (130/152346) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00157 (24/15296). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00118. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 48 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
SAMHD1	NM_015474.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.*95T>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	16/16	ENST00000646673.2
TLDC2	NM_080628.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.*18-25A>G		intron_variant		ENST00000217320.8

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
SAMHD1	ENST00000646673.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.*95T>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	16/16		NM_015474.4	P1	Q9Y3Z3-1
TLDC2	ENST00000217320.8 linkuse as main transcript	c.*18-25A>G		intron_variant		1	NM_080628.3	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000854

AC:

130

AN:

152228

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000121

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00157

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00141

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00239

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000772

AC:

192

AN:

248688

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000750

AC XY:

101

AN XY:

134690

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000247

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00107

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000924

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00130

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000657

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00113

AC:

1502

AN:

1333594

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00109

AC XY:

733

AN XY:

670022

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000162

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00112

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000394

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000120

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000562

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00141

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000658

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000853

AC:

130

AN:

152346

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000644

AC XY:

AN XY:

74492

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000120

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00157

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00141

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00236

Alfa

AF:

0.000359

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000997

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome 5

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Chilblain lupus 2

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.82

CADD

Benign

5.4

DANN

Benign

0.73

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.17

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over