20-43692228-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_002466.4(MYBL2):c.572G>A(p.Ser191Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00145 in 1,614,172 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 24 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002466.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYBL2 | NM_002466.4 | c.572G>A | p.Ser191Asn | missense_variant | 6/14 | ENST00000217026.5 | |
MYBL2 | NM_001278610.2 | c.500G>A | p.Ser167Asn | missense_variant | 5/13 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYBL2 | ENST00000217026.5 | c.572G>A | p.Ser191Asn | missense_variant | 6/14 | 1 | NM_002466.4 | P1 | |
MYBL2 | ENST00000396863.8 | c.500G>A | p.Ser167Asn | missense_variant | 5/13 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00775 AC: 1180AN: 152170Hom.: 8 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00201 AC: 505AN: 251450Hom.: 5 AF XY: 0.00149 AC XY: 203AN XY: 135906
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000790 AC: 1155AN: 1461884Hom.: 16 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000683 AC XY: 497AN XY: 727242
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00774 AC: 1178AN: 152288Hom.: 8 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00775 AC XY: 577AN XY: 74450
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jul 31, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at