20-45895143-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The ENST00000484855.4(CTSA):​n.1148C>T variant causes a non coding transcript exon change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.647 in 1,613,544 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 339,194 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.66 ( 32954 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.65 ( 306240 hom. )

Consequence

CTSA
ENST00000484855.4 non_coding_transcript_exon

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.592

Publications

23 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CTSA (HGNC:9251): (cathepsin A) This gene encodes a member of the peptidase S10 family of serine carboxypeptidases. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate two chains that comprise the heterodimeric active enzyme. This enzyme possesses deamidase, esterase and carboxypeptidase activities and acts as a scaffold in the lysosomal multienzyme complex. Mutations in this gene are associated with galactosialidosis. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]
CTSA Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • galactosialidosis
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, ClinGen, Illumina

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 20-45895143-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-45895143-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 338538.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.71 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: ENST00000484855.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
CTSA
NM_000308.4
MANE Select
c.1088+10C>T
intron
N/ANP_000299.3
CTSA
NM_001127695.3
c.1088+10C>T
intron
N/ANP_001121167.1
CTSA
NM_001167594.3
c.1037+10C>T
intron
N/ANP_001161066.2

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
CTSA
ENST00000484855.4
TSL:1
n.1148C>T
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 11 of 12
CTSA
ENST00000646241.3
MANE Select
c.1088+10C>T
intron
N/AENSP00000493613.2
CTSA
ENST00000372484.8
TSL:1
c.1142+10C>T
intron
N/AENSP00000361562.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.658
AC:
99810
AN:
151726
Hom.:
32919
Cov.:
30
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.670
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.592
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.721
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.533
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.694
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.681
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.702
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.589
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.633
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.642
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.665
AC:
166930
AN:
251128
AF XY:
0.659
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.669
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.779
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.512
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.690
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.690
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.632
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.644
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.646
AC:
944208
AN:
1461700
Hom.:
306240
Cov.:
58
AF XY:
0.646
AC XY:
469418
AN XY:
727142
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.666
AC:
22301
AN:
33476
American (AMR)
AF:
0.773
AC:
34561
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.522
AC:
13629
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.726
AC:
28837
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.677
AC:
58425
AN:
86254
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.690
AC:
36808
AN:
53352
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.580
AC:
3345
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.637
AC:
707828
AN:
1111912
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.637
AC:
38474
AN:
60386
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.484
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
19557
39113
58670
78226
97783
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
18858
37716
56574
75432
94290
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.658
AC:
99903
AN:
151844
Hom.:
32954
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.662
AC XY:
49110
AN XY:
74200
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.670
AC:
27718
AN:
41388
American (AMR)
AF:
0.721
AC:
10998
AN:
15244
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.533
AC:
1851
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.694
AC:
3572
AN:
5150
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.681
AC:
3280
AN:
4814
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.702
AC:
7390
AN:
10534
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.599
AC:
175
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.633
AC:
43018
AN:
67930
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.645
AC:
1362
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1728
3456
5184
6912
8640
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
810
1620
2430
3240
4050
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.640
Hom.:
82454
Bravo
AF:
0.658
Asia WGS
AF:
0.716
AC:
2490
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Oct 19, 2015
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Jun 19, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Combined deficiency of sialidase AND beta galactosidase Benign:3
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Jul 30, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:1
Mar 28, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: 66% of total chromosomes in ExAC

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
CADD
Benign
4.3
DANN
Benign
0.60
PhyloP100
-0.59
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.0
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.16
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs4608591; hg19: chr20-44523782; COSMIC: COSV107206972; COSMIC: COSV107206972; API