20-46128885-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001250.6(CD40):c.679C>G(p.Pro227Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0104 in 1,614,024 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 523 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in the same amino acid substitution has been previously reported as Likely benign in ClinVar. Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P227P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001250.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- hyper-IgM syndrome type 3Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD40 | NM_001250.6 | c.679C>G | p.Pro227Ala | missense_variant | Exon 9 of 9 | ENST00000372285.8 | NP_001241.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0152 AC: 2307AN: 152140Hom.: 112 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0218 AC: 5462AN: 250810 AF XY: 0.0176 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00993 AC: 14513AN: 1461766Hom.: 411 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00937 AC XY: 6811AN XY: 727178 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0152 AC: 2311AN: 152258Hom.: 112 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0167 AC XY: 1242AN XY: 74444 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hyper-IgM syndrome type 3 Benign:2
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
- -
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
not specified Benign:1
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at