20-46128885-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001250.6(CD40):āc.679C>Gā(p.Pro227Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0104 in 1,614,024 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 523 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001250.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CD40 | NM_001250.6 | c.679C>G | p.Pro227Ala | missense_variant | 9/9 | ENST00000372285.8 | NP_001241.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CD40 | ENST00000372285.8 | c.679C>G | p.Pro227Ala | missense_variant | 9/9 | 1 | NM_001250.6 | ENSP00000361359.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0152 AC: 2307AN: 152140Hom.: 112 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0218 AC: 5462AN: 250810Hom.: 291 AF XY: 0.0176 AC XY: 2388AN XY: 135612
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00993 AC: 14513AN: 1461766Hom.: 411 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00937 AC XY: 6811AN XY: 727178
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0152 AC: 2311AN: 152258Hom.: 112 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0167 AC XY: 1242AN XY: 74444
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hyper-IgM syndrome type 3 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 08, 2023 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 16, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at