20-46729482-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_030777.4(SLC2A10):āc.1541A>Gā(p.Lys514Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.011 in 1,614,048 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,571 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_030777.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC2A10 | NM_030777.4 | c.1541A>G | p.Lys514Arg | missense_variant | 4/5 | ENST00000359271.4 | NP_110404.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC2A10 | ENST00000359271.4 | c.1541A>G | p.Lys514Arg | missense_variant | 4/5 | 1 | NM_030777.4 | ENSP00000352216 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0576 AC: 8764AN: 152112Hom.: 849 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0152 AC: 3818AN: 251424Hom.: 338 AF XY: 0.0109 AC XY: 1477AN XY: 135910
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00613 AC: 8957AN: 1461818Hom.: 722 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00526 AC XY: 3823AN XY: 727224
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0576 AC: 8769AN: 152230Hom.: 849 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0564 AC XY: 4200AN XY: 74440
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 04, 2013 | Lys514Arg in exon 4 of SLC2A10: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 19.2% (846/4406) of African America n chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (htt p://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs41283344). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 25, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Nov 25, 2019 | Variant summary: SLC2A10 c.1541A>G (p.Lys514Arg) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.015 in 251424 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.21 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 333 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 133-folds over the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in SLC2A10 causing Aortopathy phenotype (0.0016), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.1541A>G in individuals affected with Aortopathy and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Three ClinVar submissions (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Arterial tortuosity syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Nov 30, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 07, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at