20-48953760-G-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_006420.3(ARFGEF2):c.808G>A(p.Ala270Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000867 in 1,613,960 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A270A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000082 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ARFGEF2
NM_006420.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0740

Publications

8 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

ARFGEF2 (HGNC:15853): (ADP ribosylation factor guanine nucleotide exchange factor 2) ADP-ribosylation factors (ARFs) play an important role in intracellular vesicular trafficking. The protein encoded by this gene is involved in the activation of ARFs by accelerating replacement of bound GDP with GTP and is involved in Golgi transport. It contains a Sec7 domain, which may be responsible for its guanine-nucleotide exchange activity and also brefeldin A inhibition. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ARFGEF2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

periventricular heterotopia with microcephaly, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
periventricular nodular heterotopia
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

ARFGEF2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.020928323).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0000131 (2/152146) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.000386 (2/5184). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000683. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 1 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_006420.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	ARFGEF2	NM_006420.3	MANE Select	c.808G>A	p.Ala270Thr	missense	Exon 6 of 39	NP_006411.2
	ARFGEF2	NM_001410846.1		c.808G>A	p.Ala270Thr	missense	Exon 6 of 39	NP_001397775.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
ARFGEF2	ENST00000371917.5	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.808G>A	p.Ala270Thr	missense	Exon 6 of 39	ENSP00000360985.4
ARFGEF2	ENST00000679436.1		c.808G>A	p.Ala270Thr	missense	Exon 6 of 39	ENSP00000504888.1
ARFGEF2	ENST00000681021.1		c.808G>A	p.Ala270Thr	missense	Exon 6 of 38	ENSP00000505972.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152146

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000386

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000239

AC:

AN:

251006

AF XY:

0.0000147

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000163

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000462

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000882

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000821

AC:

AN:

1461814

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000963

AC XY:

AN XY:

727208

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000224

AC:

AN:

44710

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26130

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000126

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000232

AC:

AN:

86246

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000187

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000173

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000180

AC:

AN:

1111972

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

60388

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.458

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152146

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000135

AC XY:

AN XY:

74320

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41428

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15276

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000386

AC:

AN:

5184

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10612

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68030

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2092

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.425

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000330

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1

Dec 11, 2014

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Inborn genetic diseases

Uncertain:1

May 15, 2025

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The c.808G>A (p.A270T) alteration is located in exon 6 (coding exon 6) of the ARFGEF2 gene. This alteration results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 808, causing the alanine (A) at amino acid position 270 to be replaced by a threonine (T). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.063

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.57

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.80

CADD

Benign

2.9

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.11

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.081

Eigen

Benign

-1.2

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.2

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.16

LIST_S2

Benign

0.31

M_CAP

Benign

0.0063

MetaRNN

Benign

0.021

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.96

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.55

PhyloP100

-0.074

PrimateAI

Benign

0.25

PROVEAN

Benign

0.84

REVEL

Benign

0.010

Sift

Benign

0.72

Sift4G

Benign

0.75

Polyphen

0.0030

Vest4

0.072

MutPred

0.12

Gain of phosphorylation at A270 (P = 0.0041)

MVP

0.12

MPC

0.41

ClinPred

0.0069

GERP RS

1.6

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.0

Varity_R

0.013

gMVP

0.23

Mutation Taster

=94/6

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.030

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over