20-50935113-A-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 2P and 10B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1
The NM_003859.3(DPM1):c.*19T>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000214 in 1,212,174 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000021 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
DPM1
NM_003859.3 3_prime_UTR
NM_003859.3 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.63
Genes affected
DPM1 (HGNC:3005): (dolichyl-phosphate mannosyltransferase subunit 1, catalytic) Dolichol-phosphate mannose (Dol-P-Man) serves as a donor of mannosyl residues on the lumenal side of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Lack of Dol-P-Man results in defective surface expression of GPI-anchored proteins. Dol-P-Man is synthesized from GDP-mannose and dolichol-phosphate on the cytosolic side of the ER by the enzyme dolichyl-phosphate mannosyltransferase. Human DPM1 lacks a carboxy-terminal transmembrane domain and signal sequence and is regulated by DPM2. Mutations in this gene are associated with congenital disorder of glycosylation type Ie. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 20-50935113-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-50935113-A-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 385237.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000214 (26/1212174) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.000587 (26/44318). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00041. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 6 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 17. This position pass quality control queck.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPM1 | NM_003859.3 | c.*19T>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 9/9 | ENST00000371588.10 | NP_003850.1 | ||
ADNP-AS1 | NR_110008.1 | n.149+3664A>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPM1 | ENST00000371588.10 | c.*19T>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 9/9 | 1 | NM_003859.3 | ENSP00000360644 | P1 | ||
ADNP-AS1 | ENST00000558899.2 | n.149+3664A>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000920 AC: 23AN: 249980Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000370 AC XY: 5AN XY: 135166
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
23
AN:
249980
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
135166
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000214 AC: 26AN: 1212174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 17 AF XY: 0.00000975 AC XY: 6AN XY: 615202
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
26
AN:
1212174
Hom.:
Cov.:
17
AF XY:
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
615202
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
33
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 27, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at