20-59019525-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PVS1_ModeratePM2
The NM_030773.4(TUBB1):c.3G>A(p.Met1?) variant causes a start lost change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,461,892 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_030773.4 start_lost
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- macrothrombocytopenia, isolated, 1, autosomal dominantInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Illumina, ClinGen
- autosomal dominant macrothrombocytopeniaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_030773.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUBB1 | NM_030773.4 | MANE Select | c.3G>A | p.Met1? | start_lost | Exon 1 of 4 | NP_110400.1 | Q9H4B7 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUBB1 | ENST00000217133.2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.3G>A | p.Met1? | start_lost | Exon 1 of 4 | ENSP00000217133.1 | Q9H4B7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251460 AF XY: 0.00000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1461892Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 727248 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at