20-59300871-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_207034.3(EDN3):c.52+7G>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000559 in 1,610,092 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_207034.3 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Waardenburg syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
- Waardenburg syndrome type 4BInheritance: AR, AD, SD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, G2P
- Waardenburg-Shah syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Hirschsprung disease, susceptibility to, 4Inheritance: AD, Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152244Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000422 AC: 1AN: 236774 AF XY: 0.00000766 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000412 AC: 6AN: 1457730Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000276 AC XY: 2AN XY: 725272 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152362Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74504 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Waardenburg syndrome Uncertain:1
The variant c.52+7G>A is a splice variant. We identified this heterozygous variant segerating in multiple affected with Waardenburg syndrome. The variant was classified based on the ACMG/AMP criteria, using the evidences PP1 -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at