20-63488355-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_001958.5(EEF1A2):c.1335C>T(p.Ser445Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00423 in 1,470,598 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 45 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0029 ( 5 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0044 ( 40 hom. )
Consequence
EEF1A2
NM_001958.5 synonymous
NM_001958.5 synonymous
Scores
1
1
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.0140
Genes affected
EEF1A2 (HGNC:3192): (eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 2) This gene encodes an isoform of the alpha subunit of the elongation factor-1 complex, which is responsible for the enzymatic delivery of aminoacyl tRNAs to the ribosome. This isoform (alpha 2) is expressed in brain, heart and skeletal muscle, and the other isoform (alpha 1) is expressed in brain, placenta, lung, liver, kidney, and pancreas. This gene may be critical in the development of ovarian cancer. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.4).
BP6
Variant 20-63488355-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-63488355-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 383879.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.014 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00287 (436/151814) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0281 (135/4812). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0242. There are 5 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 241 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 436 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEF1A2 | NM_001958.5 | c.1335C>T | p.Ser445Ser | synonymous_variant | 8/8 | ENST00000217182.6 | NP_001949.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEF1A2 | ENST00000217182.6 | c.1335C>T | p.Ser445Ser | synonymous_variant | 8/8 | 1 | NM_001958.5 | ENSP00000217182.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00289 AC: 438AN: 151706Hom.: 5 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
438
AN:
151706
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00655 AC: 612AN: 93442Hom.: 5 AF XY: 0.00855 AC XY: 446AN XY: 52176
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
612
AN:
93442
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
446
AN XY:
52176
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00439 AC: 5783AN: 1318784Hom.: 40 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00493 AC XY: 3204AN XY: 650464
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
5783
AN:
1318784
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
3204
AN XY:
650464
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00287 AC: 436AN: 151814Hom.: 5 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00325 AC XY: 241AN XY: 74232
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
436
AN:
151814
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
241
AN XY:
74232
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
48
AN:
3424
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 04, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, 33 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 15, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
EEF1A2-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jul 29, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at