21-34449551-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The ENST00000399286.3(KCNE1):c.84G>A(p.Ser28=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0115 in 967,632 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3,870 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S28S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000399286.3 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCNE1 | NM_000219.6 | c.84G>A | p.Ser28= | synonymous_variant | 4/4 | ENST00000399286.3 | NP_000210.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCNE1 | ENST00000399286.3 | c.84G>A | p.Ser28= | synonymous_variant | 4/4 | 1 | NM_000219.6 | ENSP00000382226 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00655 AC: 529AN: 80758Hom.: 157 Cov.: 12
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00362 AC: 909AN: 251306Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.00355 AC XY: 482AN XY: 135858
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0120 AC: 10604AN: 886830Hom.: 3714 Cov.: 21 AF XY: 0.0115 AC XY: 5110AN XY: 442666
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00652 AC: 527AN: 80802Hom.: 156 Cov.: 12 AF XY: 0.00591 AC XY: 233AN XY: 39418
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 09, 2016 | Variant summary: The KCNE1 c.84G>A (p.Ser28Ser) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. This variant was found in 438/120954 control chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0036212, which is approximately 362 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic KCNE1 variant (0.00001), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign and multiple publications have classified the variant as "normal/polymorphism". Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 06, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2022 | ENSG00000276289: BP4, BP7; KCNE1: BP4, BP7 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | May 07, 2012 | Ser28Ser in Exon 03 of KCNE1: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.6% (40/7020) of Eur opean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs17173510). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jul 17, 2015 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Long QT syndrome 5 Benign:1Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | in vitro | Roden Lab, Vanderbilt University Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Long QT syndrome 5;C2676723:Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Feb 17, 2022 | - - |
Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Long QT syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Apr 11, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at