Menu
GeneBe

21-34792189-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP7BP2BP4BA1

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The MAF for the synonymous variant, NM_001754.4:c.1389C>G (p.Pro463=) is 0.1206 (12%, 1976/16382 alleles) in the African subpopulation of the gnomAD cohort, which is ≥ 0.0015 (0.15%) (BA1). This variant is predicted by SSF and MES to lead to an increase in the canonical splice site score or a decrease of the canonical splice site score by no more than 10% AND no putative cryptic splice sites are created (BP4). This synonymous variant is predicted by evolutionary conservation prediction algorithms that the site is not conserved (PhyloP score -0.503315 <0.1) (BP7). This variant is detected in a homozygous state in 202 individuals in a gnomAD (BP2). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the Myeloid Malignancy Variant Curation Expert Panel for RUNX1: BA1, BP2, BP4, BP7. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA10014178/MONDO:0011071/008

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.045 ( 356 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.016 ( 552 hom. )

Consequence

RUNX1
NM_001754.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.485
Variant links:
Genes affected
RUNX1 (HGNC:10471): (RUNX family transcription factor 1) Core binding factor (CBF) is a heterodimeric transcription factor that binds to the core element of many enhancers and promoters. The protein encoded by this gene represents the alpha subunit of CBF and is thought to be involved in the development of normal hematopoiesis. Chromosomal translocations involving this gene are well-documented and have been associated with several types of leukemia. Three transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

BP2
BP4
BP7
BA1

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
RUNX1NM_001754.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1389C>G p.Pro463= synonymous_variant 9/9 ENST00000675419.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
RUNX1ENST00000675419.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.1389C>G p.Pro463= synonymous_variant 9/9 NM_001754.5 A1Q01196-8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0453
AC:
6873
AN:
151862
Hom.:
349
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.121
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00440
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0457
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0616
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0250
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0247
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000853
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0191
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00925
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0378
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0311
AC:
4309
AN:
138592
Hom.:
138
AF XY:
0.0283
AC XY:
2134
AN XY:
75510
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.118
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0552
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0616
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0216
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0294
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00180
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00925
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0255
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0157
AC:
21791
AN:
1384492
Hom.:
552
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0156
AC XY:
10686
AN XY:
683826
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.128
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0537
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0606
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0227
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0292
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00891
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0233
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0454
AC:
6906
AN:
151978
Hom.:
356
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0444
AC XY:
3301
AN XY:
74302
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.121
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0455
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0616
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0249
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0245
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000853
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00925
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0374
Alfa
AF:
0.0162
Hom.:
12
Bravo
AF:
0.0519

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesApr 03, 2018- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Hereditary thrombocytopenia and hematological cancer predisposition syndrome associated with RUNX1 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationClinGen Myeloid Malignancy Variant Curation Expert PanelAug 02, 2019The MAF for the synonymous variant, NM_001754.4:c.1389C>G (p.Pro463=) is 0.1206 (12%, 1976/16382 alleles) in the African subpopulation of the gnomAD cohort, which is >/= 0.0015 (0.15%) (BA1). This variant is predicted by SSF and MES to lead to an increase in the canonical splice site score or a decrease of the canonical splice site score by no more than 10% AND no putative cryptic splice sites are created (BP4). This synonymous variant is predicted by evolutionary conservation prediction algorithms that the site is not conserved (PhyloP score -0.503315 <0.1) (BP7). This variant is detected in a homozygous state in 202 individuals in a gnomAD (BP2). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the Myeloid Malignancy Variant Curation Expert Panel for RUNX1: BA1, BP2, BP4, BP7. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesApr 15, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 22, 2018- -
Acute myeloid leukemia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.70
CADD
Benign
6.2
DANN
Benign
0.75

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61750222; hg19: chr21-36164486; COSMIC: COSV105879017; API