Menu
GeneBe

21-36460928-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_001146079.2(CLDN14):c.*48G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000331 in 1,594,004 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00021 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

CLDN14
NM_001146079.2 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.37
Variant links:
Genes affected
CLDN14 (HGNC:2035): (claudin 14) Tight junctions represent one mode of cell-to-cell adhesion in epithelial or endothelial cell sheets, forming continuous seals around cells and serving as a physical barrier to prevent solutes and water from passing freely through the paracellular space. These junctions are comprised of sets of continuous networking strands in the outwardly facing cytoplasmic leaflet, with complementary grooves in the inwardly facing extracytoplasmic leaflet. The protein encoded by this gene, a member of the claudin family, is an integral membrane protein and a component of tight junction strands. The encoded protein also binds specifically to the WW domain of Yes-associated protein. Defects in this gene are the cause of an autosomal recessive form of nonsyndromic sensorineural deafness. It is also reported that four synonymous variants in this gene are associated with kidney stones and reduced bone mineral density. Several transcript variants encoding the same protein have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]
CLDN14-AS1 (HGNC:55953): (CLDN14 antisense RNA 1)
LNCTSI (HGNC:56660): (lncRNA TGF-beta/SMAD3 pathway interacting)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 21-36460928-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr21-36460928-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 895962.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00143 (218/152294) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00452 (188/41562). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00399. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 91 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CLDN14NM_001146079.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.*48G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 2/2 ENST00000399135.6
CLDN14-AS1NR_183529.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.468+14921C>T intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CLDN14ENST00000399135.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.*48G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 2/21 NM_001146079.2 P1
CLDN14-AS1ENST00000428667.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.277+14921C>T intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 5
LNCTSIENST00000429588.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.54-19303C>T intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00143
AC:
218
AN:
152176
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00454
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00150
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000615
AC:
138
AN:
224220
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000484
AC XY:
59
AN XY:
121834
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00471
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00217
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000201
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000358
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000214
AC:
309
AN:
1441710
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000193
AC XY:
138
AN XY:
715074
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00523
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00210
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000119
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000245
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000320
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00143
AC:
218
AN:
152294
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00122
AC XY:
91
AN XY:
74484
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00452
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00150
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00189
Alfa
AF:
0.000470
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00178
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 29 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 29, 2020- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
Cadd
Benign
0.39
Dann
Benign
0.61

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs199523516; hg19: chr21-37833226; API