21-46363881-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_006031.6(PCNT):​c.2556T>C​(p.Ala852Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.87 in 1,612,428 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 611,490 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.88 ( 58784 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.87 ( 552706 hom. )

Consequence

PCNT
NM_006031.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.303

Publications

23 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PCNT (HGNC:16068): (pericentrin) The protein encoded by this gene binds to calmodulin and is expressed in the centrosome. It is an integral component of the pericentriolar material (PCM). The protein contains a series of coiled-coil domains and a highly conserved PCM targeting motif called the PACT domain near its C-terminus. The protein interacts with the microtubule nucleation component gamma-tubulin and is likely important to normal functioning of the centrosomes, cytoskeleton, and cell-cycle progression. Mutations in this gene cause Seckel syndrome-4 and microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism type II. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]
PCNT Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism type II
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • Moyamoya disease
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.96).
BP6
Variant 21-46363881-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr21-46363881-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 159572.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.303 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.919 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_006031.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
PCNT
NM_006031.6
MANE Select
c.2556T>Cp.Ala852Ala
synonymous
Exon 14 of 47NP_006022.3
PCNT
NM_001315529.2
c.2202T>Cp.Ala734Ala
synonymous
Exon 14 of 47NP_001302458.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
PCNT
ENST00000359568.10
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.2556T>Cp.Ala852Ala
synonymous
Exon 14 of 47ENSP00000352572.5
PCNT
ENST00000480896.5
TSL:1
c.2202T>Cp.Ala734Ala
synonymous
Exon 14 of 47ENSP00000511989.1
PCNT
ENST00000695558.1
c.2556T>Cp.Ala852Ala
synonymous
Exon 14 of 48ENSP00000512015.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.878
AC:
133554
AN:
152132
Hom.:
58738
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.927
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.793
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.841
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.875
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.806
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.788
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.841
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.880
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.875
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.881
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.854
AC:
210903
AN:
246928
AF XY:
0.851
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.927
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.835
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.888
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.817
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.839
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.874
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.870
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.869
AC:
1269348
AN:
1460178
Hom.:
552706
Cov.:
68
AF XY:
0.866
AC XY:
628910
AN XY:
726394
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.926
AC:
31003
AN:
33468
American (AMR)
AF:
0.834
AC:
37277
AN:
44692
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.889
AC:
23206
AN:
26100
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.779
AC:
30938
AN:
39694
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.789
AC:
67995
AN:
86204
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.842
AC:
43905
AN:
52170
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.838
AC:
4798
AN:
5726
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.879
AC:
977741
AN:
1111774
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.870
AC:
52485
AN:
60350
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.489
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
9890
19781
29671
39562
49452
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
21346
42692
64038
85384
106730
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.878
AC:
133659
AN:
152250
Hom.:
58784
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.872
AC XY:
64914
AN XY:
74444
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.927
AC:
38518
AN:
41568
American (AMR)
AF:
0.841
AC:
12873
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.875
AC:
3039
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.806
AC:
4158
AN:
5158
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.788
AC:
3803
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.841
AC:
8926
AN:
10610
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.881
AC:
259
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.875
AC:
59499
AN:
68002
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.882
AC:
1861
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
850
1701
2551
3402
4252
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
898
1796
2694
3592
4490
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.874
Hom.:
12141
Bravo
AF:
0.882
Asia WGS
AF:
0.803
AC:
2795
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism type II Benign:4
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Jun 28, 2017
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:3
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

not specified Benign:1
Feb 08, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

PCNT-related disorder Benign:1
Jan 24, 2024
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.96
CADD
Benign
1.4
DANN
Benign
0.17
PhyloP100
0.30
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.2
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs8131546; hg19: chr21-47783796; COSMIC: COSV64030319; API