21-46416552-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_006031.6(PCNT):c.6634C>T(p.Arg2212Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00508 in 1,612,910 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 44 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006031.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCNT | NM_006031.6 | c.6634C>T | p.Arg2212Trp | missense_variant | 30/47 | ENST00000359568.10 | NP_006022.3 | |
PCNT | NM_001315529.2 | c.6280C>T | p.Arg2094Trp | missense_variant | 30/47 | NP_001302458.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCNT | ENST00000359568.10 | c.6634C>T | p.Arg2212Trp | missense_variant | 30/47 | 1 | NM_006031.6 | ENSP00000352572 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00490 AC: 746AN: 152212Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00537 AC: 1344AN: 250226Hom.: 11 AF XY: 0.00554 AC XY: 752AN XY: 135658
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00510 AC: 7454AN: 1460580Hom.: 38 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00502 AC XY: 3649AN XY: 726568
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00490 AC: 746AN: 152330Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00579 AC XY: 431AN XY: 74480
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Sep 05, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Apr 01, 2024 | PCNT: BP4, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jul 29, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Apr 22, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 20, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism type II Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Dec 05, 2020 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at