21-46418215-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_006031.6(PCNT):c.6933C>T(p.Val2311Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00287 in 1,587,530 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 27 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0030 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0029 ( 27 hom. )

Consequence

PCNT
NM_006031.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.02

Variant links:

Genes affected

PCNT (HGNC:16068): (pericentrin) The protein encoded by this gene binds to calmodulin and is expressed in the centrosome. It is an integral component of the pericentriolar material (PCM). The protein contains a series of coiled-coil domains and a highly conserved PCM targeting motif called the PACT domain near its C-terminus. The protein interacts with the microtubule nucleation component gamma-tubulin and is likely important to normal functioning of the centrosomes, cytoskeleton, and cell-cycle progression. Mutations in this gene cause Seckel syndrome-4 and microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism type II. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

PCNT links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).

BP6

Variant 21-46418215-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr21-46418215-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 211876.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr21-46418215-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.02 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00295 (449/151972) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00581 (28/4818). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00413. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 258 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 27 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PCNT	NM_006031.6 link	c.6933C>T	p.Val2311Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 31 of 47	ENST00000359568.10	NP_006022.3	O95613-1
PCNT	NM_001315529.2 link	c.6579C>T	p.Val2193Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 31 of 47		NP_001302458.1	O95613-2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PCNT	ENST00000359568.10 link	c.6933C>T	p.Val2311Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 31 of 47	1	NM_006031.6	ENSP00000352572.5		O95613-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00292

AC:

444

AN:

151854

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00134

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00151

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000192

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00581

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0119

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00301

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00239

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00372

AC:

935

AN:

251110

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00423

AC XY:

575

AN XY:

135774

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00118

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00182

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000199

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000109

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00791

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0133

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00268

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00261

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00286

AC:

4112

AN:

1435558

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00319

AC XY:

2282

AN XY:

716150

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000775

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00193

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000505

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00809

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0131

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00219

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00330

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00295

AC:

449

AN:

151972

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00347

AC XY:

258

AN XY:

74282

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00145

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00150

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00581

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.0119

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00301

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00237

Alfa

AF:

0.00231

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00171

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00262

EpiControl

AF:

0.00267

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 01, 2023

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

PCNT: BP4, BP7, BS2 -

May 02, 2018

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism type II

Benign:2

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Jun 22, 2020

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Uncertain:1

Oct 21, 2014

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

PCNT-related disorder

Benign:1

Jun 10, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.65

CADD

Benign

0.62

DANN

Benign

0.83

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over