Menu
GeneBe

22-20859092-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_004782.4(SNAP29):c.-19C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.542 in 1,574,152 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 233,853 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.50 ( 19890 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.55 ( 213963 hom. )

Consequence

SNAP29
NM_004782.4 5_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.54
Variant links:
Genes affected
SNAP29 (HGNC:11133): (synaptosome associated protein 29) This gene, a member of the SNAP25 gene family, encodes a protein involved in multiple membrane trafficking steps. Two other members of this gene family, SNAP23 and SNAP25, encode proteins that bind a syntaxin protein and mediate synaptic vesicle membrane docking and fusion to the plasma membrane. The protein encoded by this gene binds tightly to multiple syntaxins and is localized to intracellular membrane structures rather than to the plasma membrane. While the protein is mostly membrane-bound, a significant fraction of it is found free in the cytoplasm. Use of multiple polyadenylation sites has been noted for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
PI4KA (HGNC:8983): (phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alpha) This gene encodes a phosphatidylinositol (PI) 4-kinase which catalyzes the first committed step in the biosynthesis of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. The mammalian PI 4-kinases have been classified into two types, II and III, based on their molecular mass, and modulation by detergent and adenosine. The protein encoded by this gene is a type III enzyme that is not inhibited by adenosine. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2018]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).
BP6
Variant 22-20859092-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-20859092-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 340826.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-20859092-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.576 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SNAP29NM_004782.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.-19C>T 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/5 ENST00000215730.12

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SNAP29ENST00000215730.12 linkuse as main transcriptc.-19C>T 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/51 NM_004782.4 P1
PI4KAENST00000449120.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.-19+31G>A intron_variant 4
SNAP29ENST00000490458.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.12C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 1/22

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.504
AC:
76633
AN:
151960
Hom.:
19887
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.403
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.421
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.456
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.518
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.419
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.595
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.711
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.484
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.546
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.480
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.527
AC:
114504
AN:
217444
Hom.:
31128
AF XY:
0.534
AC XY:
63853
AN XY:
119502
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.392
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.409
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.516
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.407
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.602
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.706
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.547
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.523
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.545
AC:
775737
AN:
1422074
Hom.:
213963
Cov.:
27
AF XY:
0.548
AC XY:
387858
AN XY:
707996
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.393
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.419
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.519
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.442
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.606
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.701
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.548
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.537
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.504
AC:
76672
AN:
152078
Hom.:
19890
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.511
AC XY:
38009
AN XY:
74358
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.403
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.455
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.518
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.419
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.595
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.711
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.546
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.482
Alfa
AF:
0.528
Hom.:
13855
Bravo
AF:
0.479
Asia WGS
AF:
0.509
AC:
1771
AN:
3470

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

CEDNIK syndrome Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterMay 31, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 15, 2021- -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, flagged submissionclinical testingGeneDxJul 06, 2015This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 20, 2021- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.65
Cadd
Benign
4.7
Dann
Benign
0.87
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.92
RBP_regulation_power_radar
2.0

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1061063; hg19: chr22-21213380; API