22-20993955-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM1PM2PP3_Moderate
The NM_006767.4(LZTR1):c.1385T>G(p.Ile462Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000657 in 152,192 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I462V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006767.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- LZTR1-related schwannomatosisInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Noonan syndrome 10Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
- schwannomatosisInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
- Noonan syndromeInheritance: AR, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- Noonan syndrome 2Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp
- breast cancerInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: G2P
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LZTR1 | NM_006767.4 | c.1385T>G | p.Ile462Ser | missense_variant | Exon 13 of 21 | ENST00000646124.2 | NP_006758.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LZTR1 | ENST00000646124.2 | c.1385T>G | p.Ile462Ser | missense_variant | Exon 13 of 21 | NM_006767.4 | ENSP00000496779.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000403 AC: 1AN: 247974 AF XY: 0.00000744 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 34
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74348 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
This sequence change replaces isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 462 of the LZTR1 protein (p.Ile462Ser). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with LZTR1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 1443164). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt LZTR1 protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
LZTR1: PM2
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome;CN230736:Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1
The p.I462S variant (also known as c.1385T>G), located in coding exon 13 of the LZTR1 gene, results from a T to G substitution at nucleotide position 1385. The isoleucine at codon 462 is replaced by serine, an amino acid with dissimilar properties. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at