22-23801019-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_003073.5(SMARCB1):ā€‹c.438A>Gā€‹(p.Pro146=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000943 in 1,614,144 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0049 ( 7 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00053 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

SMARCB1
NM_003073.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -5.51
Variant links:
Genes affected
SMARCB1 (HGNC:11103): (SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily b, member 1) The protein encoded by this gene is part of a complex that relieves repressive chromatin structures, allowing the transcriptional machinery to access its targets more effectively. The encoded nuclear protein may also bind to and enhance the DNA joining activity of HIV-1 integrase. This gene has been found to be a tumor suppressor, and mutations in it have been associated with malignant rhabdoid tumors. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 22-23801019-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-23801019-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 239484.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-23801019-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-5.51 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00494 (753/152282) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0169 (704/41562). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0159. There are 7 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 353 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 753 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SMARCB1NM_003073.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.438A>G p.Pro146= synonymous_variant 4/9 ENST00000644036.2
SMARCB1NM_001362877.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.438A>G p.Pro146= synonymous_variant 4/9
SMARCB1NM_001317946.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.411A>G p.Pro137= synonymous_variant 4/9
SMARCB1NM_001007468.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.411A>G p.Pro137= synonymous_variant 4/9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SMARCB1ENST00000644036.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.438A>G p.Pro146= synonymous_variant 4/9 NM_003073.5 A1Q12824-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00494
AC:
752
AN:
152164
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0170
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00229
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00335
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00136
AC:
343
AN:
251488
Hom.:
4
AF XY:
0.00102
AC XY:
138
AN XY:
135916
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0172
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00147
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000879
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000489
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000526
AC:
769
AN:
1461862
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000466
AC XY:
339
AN XY:
727236
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0166
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00154
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000531
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00123
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00494
AC:
753
AN:
152282
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00474
AC XY:
353
AN XY:
74458
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0169
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00229
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00331
Alfa
AF:
0.00252
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00597
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesMar 31, 2022- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenApr 01, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 25, 2016Variant summary: The SMARCB1 c.438A>G (p.Pro146Pro) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 splice prediction tools in Alamut predict no change to normal splicing. This variant was found in 193/121404 control chromosomes (including 3 homozygotes), predominantly observed in the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0167211 (174/10406). This frequency is significantly greater than the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic SMARCB1 variant (0.0000001), highly suggesting this is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African origin. Based on the synonymous nature of this variant and the high allele frequency in the general population, this variant is classified as Benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 18, 2018- -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Schwannomatosis 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsAug 03, 2016This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
CADD
Benign
0.17
DANN
Benign
0.53
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35105793; hg19: chr22-24143206; COSMIC: COSV104371229; COSMIC: COSV104371229; API