22-26625225-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001886.3(CRYBA4):c.159-256A>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.274 in 152,036 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6,515 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001886.3 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- cataract 23Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
- cataract - microcornea syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- early-onset lamellar cataractInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001886.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRYBA4 | NM_001886.3 | MANE Select | c.159-256A>G | intron | N/A | NP_001877.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRYBA4 | ENST00000354760.4 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.159-256A>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000346805.3 | |||
| CRYBA4 | ENST00000466315.1 | TSL:5 | n.56-256A>G | intron | N/A |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.274 AC: 41664AN: 151918Hom.: 6506 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.274 AC: 41710AN: 152036Hom.: 6515 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.278 AC XY: 20626AN XY: 74320 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at