22-28687936-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7
The ENST00000404276.6(CHEK2):c.1593G>A(p.Glu531=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000105 in 1,596,422 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000046 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
CHEK2
ENST00000404276.6 synonymous
ENST00000404276.6 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.176
Genes affected
CHEK2 (HGNC:16627): (checkpoint kinase 2) In response to DNA damage and replication blocks, cell cycle progression is halted through the control of critical cell cycle regulators. The protein encoded by this gene is a cell cycle checkpoint regulator and putative tumor suppressor. It contains a forkhead-associated protein interaction domain essential for activation in response to DNA damage and is rapidly phosphorylated in response to replication blocks and DNA damage. When activated, the encoded protein is known to inhibit CDC25C phosphatase, preventing entry into mitosis, and has been shown to stabilize the tumor suppressor protein p53, leading to cell cycle arrest in G1. In addition, this protein interacts with and phosphorylates BRCA1, allowing BRCA1 to restore survival after DNA damage. Mutations in this gene have been linked with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a highly penetrant familial cancer phenotype usually associated with inherited mutations in TP53. Also, mutations in this gene are thought to confer a predisposition to sarcomas, breast cancer, and brain tumors. This nuclear protein is a member of the CDS1 subfamily of serine/threonine protein kinases. Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.76).
BP6
Variant 22-28687936-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-28687936-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 230806.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=5}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.176 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEK2 | NM_007194.4 | c.1593G>A | p.Glu531= | synonymous_variant | 15/15 | ENST00000404276.6 | NP_009125.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEK2 | ENST00000404276.6 | c.1593G>A | p.Glu531= | synonymous_variant | 15/15 | 1 | NM_007194.4 | ENSP00000385747 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152208Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
7
AN:
152208
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000231 AC: 54AN: 233666Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000327 AC XY: 42AN XY: 128342
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
54
AN:
233666
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
42
AN XY:
128342
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000111 AC: 161AN: 1444096Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000147 AC XY: 106AN XY: 718794
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
161
AN:
1444096
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
106
AN XY:
718794
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152326Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000671 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74492
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
7
AN:
152326
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
74492
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Nov 19, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The CHEK2 p.Glu531= variant was not identified in the literature. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs758555487) as "With Likely benign allele ", and in ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae; as likely benign by Ambry Genetics, GeneDx and Color). The variant was identified in control databases in 54 of 260100 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0002 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 1 of 22578 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), Other in 1 of 6276 chromosomes (freq: 0.000159), European in 1 of 121982 chromosomes (freq: 0.000008), and South Asian in 51 of 30512 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), while the variant was not observed in the Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, and Finnish, populations. The p.Glu531= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 04, 2015 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Sep 16, 2016 | - - |
CHEK2-related cancer predisposition Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 28, 2020 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at